NSW judge Desmond Fagan ruled that anti-Israel graffiti vandalism is not antisemitic, a decision that has reignited debate over how hate crimes are classified. The case involved Mohommed Farhat, who pleaded guilty to property damage but was treated more harshly after authorities labeled his actions antisemitic.
Background of the Case
Mohommed Farhat, then 20, was arrested in November 2024 after spray-painting slogans like "Fuk Israel" and "PKK coming" on cars and buildings in Sydney's eastern suburbs. He also set a vehicle alight. Farhat pleaded guilty to 15 property damage offences but claimed he was recruited by an unknown person and paid to do the graffiti.
Despite his guilty plea, police and lower courts treated the vandalism as antisemitic, leading to a harsher sentence and an attempt to classify him as a future terror threat. This week, NSW Supreme Court Justice Desmond Fagan ruled that the entire process had gone "haywire" due to this mischaracterization.
Judge's Ruling and Reasoning
Justice Fagan found that "Fuk Israel" was "a curse against a foreign state" rather than an expression of antisemitism. He criticized the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism as "detached from reality" and "inept." The judge noted that the case had been "derailed" from the start by police and lower court errors.
Fagan also said the case appeared to be a "serious miscarriage of justice," as police failed to share intelligence that could have affected the remand decision. The ruling has significant implications for how similar cases are handled in Australia.

The IHRA Definition Controversy
The IHRA definition of antisemitism includes examples such as "denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination" and "applying double standards to Israel." Critics argue this conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism. Justice Fagan's ruling aligns with this critique, stating the definition is "inept" for legal purposes.
This case highlights the tension between protecting Jewish communities and preserving free speech. The judge's decision may prompt a review of how hate crime laws are applied in New South Wales.
Comparison: IHRA Definition vs. Judge's Interpretation
| Aspect | IHRA Definition | Judge's Ruling |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-Israel graffiti | Potentially antisemitic | Not antisemitic; political statement |
| Focus | Protects Jewish people | Distinguishes criticism of state |
| Legal application | Broad and ambiguous | Narrow and context-specific |
Key Takeaways
- NSW Supreme Court ruled anti-Israel graffiti is not automatically antisemitic.
- Justice Fagan criticized the IHRA definition as "detached from reality."
- The case was deemed a "serious miscarriage of justice" due to mislabeling.
- Police and lower courts failed to properly assess the offender's motivation.
- This ruling could influence future hate crime prosecutions in Australia.
Implications for Hate Crime Law
Legal experts suggest this ruling may lead to more careful scrutiny of hate crime charges. The decision emphasizes that political statements against foreign governments should not be conflated with racial or religious hatred. It also raises questions about the use of the IHRA definition in Australian courts.
For now, the case has been sent back for resentencing, and Farhat remains in custody. The outcome will be closely watched by civil liberties groups and Jewish community organizations.
FAQ
What did the NSW judge rule about anti-Israel graffiti?
Why was the case called a "miscarriage of justice"?
What is the IHRA definition of antisemitism?
This ruling is a landmark moment for free speech and hate crime law in Australia. It underscores the need for precise legal definitions that protect all communities without stifling legitimate political expression.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of espresso machine coffee truck, truck bed air mattress, gps device truckers, door locks dementia patients, and folding cane. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of walking cane seat, recliners neck pain, chairs inc glider, retainer cleaner, and bed rails seniors. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.