Will the UK budget deliver growth in every postcode? That's the question on everyone's lips after John Healey's first budget outlined a major devolution drive. The plan promises to shift power and money from Westminster to local leaders, but skeptics wonder if it's more rhetoric than reality.
The budget set ambitious milestones, including a 2028 commitment to devolve some income tax receipts to mayors of strategic authorities (MSAs). It also pledged that next year, 20% of business rates revenues will go to mayors, rising to 100% by the end of the decade. These are significant fiscal levers that could reshape local economies.
What the Devolution Deal Includes
At the heart of the plan is a new wave of devolution deals across England, with negotiations also underway in Scotland, Wales, and possibly Northern Ireland. The goal is to rewire Britain's political landscape, giving more local control over spending and taxation. According to Healey, this is "the biggest wave of devolution in a generation."
Key elements include:
- Income tax devolution: By 2028, mayors of strategic authorities could receive a share of income tax receipts.
- Business rates retention: Mayors will get 20% of business rates revenues next year, with a path to 100% by 2030.
- Tourism levy: New powers for mayors to impose an overnight visitors levy on hotels and B&Bs.
- Expanded mayoral map: Dozens of new mayors could be elected within two years, each controlling billions in spending.
These measures are designed to give local leaders the tools to drive growth tailored to their areas. But will they work?
The Promise vs. the Practicalities
Andy Burnham's signature phrase, "good growth in every postcode and hope in every heart," encapsulates the ambition. Yet delivering on that promise is fraught with challenges. Not all areas have the same economic starting point, and devolving powers without adequate funding could widen regional inequalities.
For instance, business rates retention may benefit wealthy areas with high property values more than deprived ones. Similarly, income tax devolution could incentivize mayors to focus on high-earning residents rather than broad-based growth. The government insists it will monitor outcomes, but details are scarce.
What It Means for Local Economies
If implemented effectively, devolution could unleash local innovation and investment. Mayors would have a direct stake in growing their tax base, potentially leading to more business-friendly policies and infrastructure projects. The tourism levy, for example, could fund local improvements that attract visitors.
However, without careful design, these powers could also lead to a postcode lottery in public services. The government must ensure that funding formulas account for need, not just tax potential. Otherwise, the gap between prosperous and struggling areas could widen.
Comparing Devolution Models
Different regions will have varying levels of control. The table below summarizes the key differences in the current proposals.
| Power | Current Status | Proposed Change |
|---|---|---|
| Business rates | Partially retained | 20% to mayors next year, 100% by 2030 |
| Income tax | Centralized | Some devolved to MSAs by 2028 |
| Tourism levy | Not available | Mayors can impose overnight visitor levy |
| Number of mayors | ~10 | Dozens within two years |
This comparison highlights the scale of the shift. But the success of these policies hinges on execution and oversight.
Challenges and Opportunities
One major challenge is capacity. Many local authorities lack the expertise to manage new fiscal powers effectively. The government has promised support, but training and resources will be crucial. Another issue is accountability: with more power at the local level, voters must be able to hold mayors to account. Context on how this played out before sits in UK Budget Devolution: Growth in Every Postcode or Empty Promise. A companion piece, UK Budget 2026: Retail and Hospitality Businesses Assess Relief, approaches the same subject from another angle.
On the opportunity side, devolution could foster experimentation. Different regions can try different approaches to growth, and successful models can be scaled. This is the essence of "supply-side economics" that Healey mentioned—giving people the tools to create growth from the bottom up. The background to this story is set out in Business: latest articles. A related thread runs through Healey's Budget Unveils £1.5bn Devolution Boost for Growth.
What to Watch Next
The next milestone is the rollout of 20% business rates retention next year. How mayors use these funds will be an early indicator of success. Also watch for the negotiations with Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, which could set a precedent for asymmetric devolution. Earlier coverage in Budget 2026: Six Charts Reveal Economic Realities for Chancellor shows how the argument developed. A closer look at the same subject appears in Burnham Urged to Tax Online Sales Higher to Save High Streets.
Ultimately, the test will be whether "growth in every postcode" becomes a reality or remains a slogan. With the next election on the horizon, the government will be eager to show tangible results. For now, local leaders are cautiously optimistic but demand clarity on funding and powers. Anyone following the wider picture can start with John Healey's First Budget: Who Wins and Who Pays. The same theme surfaces in Burnham Warned: Climate Disaster Looms Without Coherent Policy, which takes a different angle.
FAQ
What is the government's devolution plan?
The plan aims to transfer powers and funding from Westminster to local mayors and authorities, including control over business rates, some income tax, and new tourism levies, to stimulate local growth.
When will mayors get income tax powers?
The budget commits to devolving some income tax receipts to mayors of strategic authorities by 2028, though details on the proportion and mechanism are still unclear.
How will the tourism levy work?
Mayors will be able to impose an overnight visitors levy on hotels and B&Bs in their area. The rate and scope will be determined locally, with proceeds likely funding tourism-related infrastructure.
Will devolution reduce regional inequality?
It could, but only if funding formulas address need and local capacity is built. Without safeguards, devolution might benefit wealthier areas more, potentially widening gaps.