Water company bosses have seen their total pay rise despite a government bonus ban and public fury over pollution and bills. According to a Guardian analysis, chief executives and chief financial officers at 14 major water companies in England and Wales received overall pay packets that increased by 1.5% to £25.3 million over the past year. The revelations come as water bills soar and Thames Water teeters on the brink of insolvency, with millions under hosepipe bans.
Record Pay Packages Despite Bonus Ban
Among the most striking examples is Mark Thurston of Anglian Water, who received £1.9 million, including a £500,000 “retention payment” that effectively bypassed the government’s bonus ban. The largest package went to Louise Beardmore, chief executive of United Utilities, who earned £2.5 million – £1.1 million more than the previous year. These increases were driven by salary rises and the use of pay loopholes that critics say undermine the intended curbs on executive compensation.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
The ban on bonuses was introduced in 2025 amid public anger over sewage dumping and rising household bills. Yet companies have found ways to reward their bosses through retention payments, performance-linked share awards, and other mechanisms. The industry’s defense often cites the need to attract and retain top talent in a challenging regulatory environment, but this argument is wearing thin with politicians and consumer groups.
Comparison of Top Water Executive Pay
| Executive | Company | Total Pay | Year-on-Year Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Beardmore | United Utilities | £2.5 million | +£1.1 million |
| Mark Thurston | Anglian Water | £1.9 million | Including £500k retention |
| Other CEOs (average) | Various | £1.8 million | +1.5% overall |
Public and Political Backlash Intensifies
The news has added fuel to calls for greater public control of the water industry. Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, has already signaled his desire to exert “more public control” and has suggested temporarily moving Thames Water into government ownership. Green Party MP Adrian Ramsay described the pay packages as “a perfect illustration of everything that is wrong with treating this essential public resource as a private commodity.”
With water bills rising sharply to fund belated infrastructure investments and pollution incidents continuing to plague rivers and seas, the public mood is increasingly hostile. Many customers feel they are paying more while executives collect ever-larger payouts. The political pressure is mounting, and Burnham’s stance could be a catalyst for wider reform.
Key Takeaways
- Executive pay at water companies rose 1.5% despite a government bonus ban.
- Some CEOs used loopholes like retention payments to circumvent the ban.
- Thames Water faces insolvency while bills and drought restrictions hit millions.
- Calls for public ownership or temporary government control are growing.
- The ongoing sewage pollution crisis continues to erode public trust.
FAQ
Why did water bosses get pay rises despite a bonus ban?
Companies used mechanisms such as retention payments, salary increases, and performance-linked awards that were not classified as bonuses under the government's 2025 ban.
What is Andy Burnham's plan for the water industry?
Burnham has called for more public control and suggested temporarily nationalizing Thames Water to address mismanagement and financial instability.
How much did water bills increase?
Water companies have been allowed to raise bills sharply to fund infrastructure upgrades, with many households seeing double-digit percentage increases over the past year.
Will the bonus ban be tightened?
Pressure is mounting on the government to close loopholes. Political opponents, including the Green Party, are pushing for stronger regulation or public ownership to ensure funds are reinvested.