President Donald Trump's media ban came under intense scrutiny in federal court on Thursday as a lawyer representing CNN, MS Now, and Politico argued that Trump himself provided the strongest evidence that the ban was retaliatory. The media coalition was seeking to extend a temporary restraining order (TRO) that requires the White House to restore press access for the three outlets.
Judge Extends Temporary Restraining Order
District Court Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, extended the TRO until Tuesday, giving the White House until then to allow journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico to continue accessing the building. Judge Kelly indicated he would likely rule on a motion for a preliminary injunction by that day.
Find Original, High-end Home Decor that spark conversation at Grand Goldman Shop.
The TRO was originally issued on September 24 and was set to expire on Thursday. The extension ensures that the media organizations can continue reporting from the White House while the legal battle unfolds.
Lawyer: Trump's Own Words Prove Retaliation
Theodore J Boutrous, a prominent attorney who has represented numerous media companies in lawsuits against the Trump administration, told the judge that Trump made it "abundantly clear" in a recent interview with Time magazine that he barred the three news organizations because of their critical coverage.
When asked by Time about the "impetus" for the ban, Trump replied: "It's just bad story after bad story, and when I say bad story, I can handle bad stories." Boutrous argued that this statement directly violates binding court precedent, which prohibits removing news organizations from the White House for editorial or viewpoint-based reasons.
Legal Precedent and Implications
The case hinges on whether the White House violated the First Amendment by excluding journalists based on their reporting. Under established law, the government cannot deny press access simply because it dislikes the coverage.
If Judge Kelly grants a preliminary injunction, the White House would be forced to maintain access for CNN, MS Now, and Politico throughout the litigation. This could set a significant precedent for how the administration interacts with the press.
| Event | Date | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Temporary Restraining Order Issued | September 24 | White House ordered to lift ban for 14 days |
| TRO Expiration | Thursday | Extended until Tuesday by Judge Kelly |
| Preliminary Injunction Ruling | Expected Tuesday | Pending |
Key Takeaways
- Judge Timothy Kelly extended the temporary restraining order until Tuesday.
- Theodore Boutrous argued that Trump's own words prove the ban was retaliatory.
- The case could set a precedent for press access under the Trump administration.
- CNN, MS Now, and Politico will continue to have White House access until at least Tuesday.
FAQ
What is the temporary restraining order?
The TRO is a court order issued on September 24 that requires the White House to lift the ban on CNN, MS Now, and Politico for 14 days. It has been extended until Tuesday.
Why did Trump ban these news organizations?
According to lawyer Theodore Boutrous, Trump admitted in a Time magazine interview that the ban was due to "bad story after bad story," indicating it was based on critical coverage.
What happens next in the case?
Judge Kelly is expected to rule on a motion for a preliminary injunction by Tuesday. If granted, the White House would have to maintain press access for the three outlets during the litigation.
Browse the Shop
Acacia frida deluxe solid wood bed frame |
Bedroom bench |
Bed chest drawers |
Lingerie dresser |
Frame base |
Mirror with jewelry storage |
30 Bathroom Vanity |
Memory foam queen mattress |
Mattresses for back pain |
Nightstand set of 2 |
Grand Goldman Shop |
Civil Lawyer
Deutschland Trikot WM 2026
