Andy Burnham's bus blueprint for public control is emerging as a model for governing Britain, with the government backing similar moves in the West Midlands and reinstating a £2 fare cap. This approach prioritizes affordability and reliability, aiming to reduce social exclusion and boost local economies.
The National Significance of Manchester's Bus Reforms
Barely a month into his premiership, Andy Burnham is already taking the lessons of Manchester’s buses national. His government has backed the West Midlands mayor Richard Parker’s move to bring the region’s main bus operation into public control. In July, he announced that he would reinstate a £2 national bus fare cap from January 2027, and he’s also expanding free bus travel for disabled people to all hours.
Get Lifetime Access to Top AI Tools
Find Bleeding Edge Business Software at Scandalous Prices on Appsumo.
Transport affordability is clearly part of Mr Burnham’s cost of living programme. That is to be applauded, as is the emphasis on public transport, which – importantly for Labour – reduces social exclusion, boosts local economies, and is better for the environment. Yet buses may matter to Mr Burnham for another reason: they offer a blueprint for how he wants to govern.
Public Control and Affordability
Mr Burnham seems to have a worked-out model. He told the Times this week that the prescription for services such as water, housing and energy isn’t yet clear, “with the exception of buses”. Public control, Mr Burnham reasons, gives government the power to make provision cheaper and more reliable – and to shape it around the public interest. For buses, that means the government determining the shape of the network even where private companies run the services. Municipal ownership this is not.
Despite that, more money will be needed. Austerity slashed public transport budgets, and consequently bus journeys fell. Outside London, buses clock up about 736m miles a year, nearly a third below 2005. Getting back to a decent service would cost a paltry sum.
The Cost of a Decent Bus Network
For £300m a year, England could get buses back into its worst-served communities. For about £1bn, the Campaign for Better Transport calculated, ministers could provide decent, frequent services in towns and rural areas. In 2021, the Campaign to Protect Rural England put the price of a Swiss-style bus network – an hourly service from 6am to midnight for every village of more than 300 people – at £2.7bn a year. Accounting for inflation, this remains a modest investment compared to the benefits.
| Investment Level | Service Outcome | Annual Cost |
|---|---|---|
| £300m | Restore buses to worst-served communities | £300 million |
| £1bn | Decent, frequent services in towns and rural areas | £1 billion |
| £2.7bn | Swiss-style network (hourly 6am-midnight for villages >300) | £2.7 billion |
Key Takeaways
- Public control of buses can lower costs and improve reliability.
- Investment in bus networks reduces social exclusion and boosts local economies.
- The £2 fare cap and free travel for disabled people are part of a broader cost-of-living strategy.
- Even a Swiss-style network would cost under £3bn annually – a small price for national connectivity.