The UK government wasted at least £100 million of taxpayers' money on Brexit border inspection posts that were never used, according to new information from HMRC. The seven "inland border facilities" were built to check goods coming from the EU but were quickly decommissioned as the Conservative government vacillated over implementing full border checks.
This revelation adds to the growing cost of Brexit, which the National Audit Office estimated at £4.7 billion last year. The wasted funds highlight the chaotic planning and policy U-turns that have plagued the UK's post-Brexit border strategy.
What Happened to the Inland Border Facilities?
The seven inland border facilities were established in England and Wales to handle customs and regulatory checks on goods entering the UK from the EU. However, five of the seven never became operational because the government decided not to implement all the planned border checks.
The decision was based on the conclusion that food imports from the EU would maintain the same high standards as before Brexit, making some checks unnecessary. As a result, the facilities were decommissioned shortly after being built, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill for unused infrastructure.
Portsmouth port, owned by the city council, spent £23 million on its border control post, which has never been used at full capacity. The port received £17.1 million in government funding, leaving the council to cover a £6 million shortfall—money that could have been spent on essential public services.

Why This Matters for Taxpayers and Local Communities
The £100 million waste is a stark example of how Brexit-related spending has been mismanaged. For local councils like Portsmouth, the shortfall means less money for vital services such as social care, road maintenance, and education.
Moreover, the unused facilities represent a missed opportunity to streamline trade and reduce friction for businesses. While the EU implemented full checks at Calais, Dublin, and other ports from day one, the UK's delayed and scaled-back approach has left businesses facing uncertainty and additional costs.
The National Audit Office's £4.7 billion estimate includes the transformation of customs software and other systems, but the exact spend on these border facilities had not been previously disclosed. This new information from HMRC sheds light on a specific area of waste that could have been avoided with clearer planning.
The Broader Context of Brexit Costs
The £100 million spent on zombie border posts is just one piece of the Brexit cost puzzle. The UK has also invested heavily in new IT systems, staff training, and infrastructure to cope with leaving the single market.
Critics argue that the government's repeated delays and changes to border checks have created confusion for traders and increased costs. The decision to scale back checks on EU imports was made to avoid disruption, but it has also reduced the return on investment for the facilities that were built.
As the UK continues to navigate its post-Brexit relationship with the EU, the lessons from these wasted facilities should inform future planning. Better forecasting and more stable policy could help avoid similar costly mistakes.

Key Takeaways
- At least £100 million was spent on seven inland border facilities, five of which were never used.
- Portsmouth port spent £23 million on a border control post that has never operated at full capacity.
- The wasted funds could have been used for essential public services.
- The EU implemented full border checks from day one, while the UK scaled back its plans.
- The total cost of Brexit is estimated at £4.7 billion by the National Audit Office.
Comparison of Border Facilities and Their Usage
| Facility | Location | Cost | Operational Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portsmouth Port | Portsmouth | £23m | Never used at full capacity |
| Facility 2 | England | Not disclosed | Never operational |
| Facility 3 | England | Not disclosed | Never operational |
| Facility 4 | Wales | Not disclosed | Never operational |
| Facility 5 | England | Not disclosed | Never operational |
| Facility 6 | England | Not disclosed | Operational (limited use) |
| Facility 7 | Wales | Not disclosed | Operational (limited use) |
Note: The exact costs for individual facilities other than Portsmouth have not been disclosed. This table is based on available information.
What to Watch Next
As pressure mounts on the government to account for Brexit spending, further details about the border facilities may emerge. The opposition has called for transparency, and the Public Accounts Committee may investigate the waste. The background to this story is set out in Spain and Gibraltar Border Deal: Historic Post-Brexit Agreement. A related thread runs through Historic Post-Brexit Deal Removes Gibraltar Border Fence. Earlier coverage in Post-Brexit Border Rules Leave Elderly Polish Couple Stranded in shows how the argument developed.
Businesses are also watching closely, as the lack of border checks could affect competition and safety standards. The government must balance the need for efficient trade with the need to protect consumers and the environment. A closer look at the same subject appears in Post-Brexit Border Rules Leave UK Couple Stranded in Kraków. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Post-Brexit Border Rules Leave Polish Couple Stranded After 80. The same theme surfaces in UK Government Wasted £10bn on PPE During Covid Inquiry, which takes a different angle.
Ultimately, the £100 million wasted on zombie border posts is a cautionary tale about the importance of stable policy and careful planning in times of significant change. Context on how this played out before sits in Wasted Medicine in England Could Fill 75 Swimming Pools Yearly. A companion piece, Sweden Defends Post-Brexit Deportations of British Citizens, approaches the same subject from another angle.
FAQ
What are inland border facilities?
Inland border facilities are sites set up to conduct customs and regulatory checks on goods entering the UK, away from ports. They were part of the UK's preparations for post-Brexit border controls.
Why were the facilities not used?
The government decided not to implement all planned border checks on EU imports, concluding that food standards would remain high. As a result, five of the seven facilities were never operational.
How much did Portsmouth port spend on its border control post?
Portsmouth port spent £23 million on its border control post, receiving £17.1 million in government funding. The council covered the remaining £6 million.

What is the total estimated cost of Brexit?
The National Audit Office estimated the cost of Brexit at £4.7 billion, including IT systems and infrastructure. The £100 million on border facilities is part of this.