US Backs Haftar Clan in Libya: Lessons for UK Foreign Policy 2026

The US has backed Libya's Haftar clan, a move that has drawn criticism and raised questions about Western involvement in the conflict-ridden nation. As Libya struggles to achieve unity and democracy, external support for warlords like Khalifa Haftar and his son Saddam undermines these goals. The UK, presented with an opportunity to broker peace, must not follow the same path.

The US-Haftar Alliance: A Controversial Partnership

For years, the United States has provided support to Khalifa Haftar, a powerful military commander in eastern Libya. This backing, ostensibly aimed at counterterrorism and stabilizing the region, has effectively bolstered a warlord whose ambitions have prolonged Libya's conflict. Recent reports linking Saddam Haftar to drone attacks on fuel facilities highlight the risks of such alliances. By backing the Haftar clan, the US has prioritized short-term strategic interests over the long-term goal of democratic governance in Libya.

Why the UK Must Avoid the Same Mistake

The UK has a choice: continue down a path of supporting strongmen or seize the opportunity to facilitate genuine peace and unification. A report from 9BR Chambers, Libya: The Voice of the Tribes, outlines a proposal for the UK to host a peace and unification conference, bringing together political leaders and legitimate military commanders from both east and west Libya. This approach would sideline bad actors and give voice to those genuinely committed to peace. Unfortunately, both Conservative and Labour governments have failed to take up this offer, missing a crucial chance to lead.

Key Takeaways

• US support for the Haftar clan has exacerbated Libya's conflict and undermined democratic prospects.
• The UK has been offered a role in brokering peace talks but has yet to act.
• Supporting warlords like Haftar only perpetuates corruption and instability.
• A conference involving legitimate Libyan leaders could pave the way for unity and resource management.
• Western nations must prioritize peace and democracy over short-term strategic gains.

Comparing Approaches: US vs. UK Potential

The table below contrasts the US approach of backing the Haftar clan with the proposed UK-led peace conference.

The Path to Peace: A UK-Led Initiative

The UK has a unique opportunity to lead by example. By issuing visas and inviting Libyan political and military leaders to a peace conference, the UK can help break the cycle of violence. The Libyan people yearn for peace, security, and the ability to use their natural resources for the benefit of all. Instead, their wealth is squandered on conflict and corruption, enriching only the warmongers. The UK must act decisively to support a Libyan-owned and Libyan-led peace process.

FAQ