Patrick McCabe's GCSE success using eye-tracking technology has captured national attention, but it also reveals the limits of SEND technology in mainstream education. The 16-year-old, who has cerebral palsy, completed his exams over four months using an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device. His story highlights both the potential and the shortcomings of assistive tech for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).
The Inspiring Journey of Patrick McCabe
Patrick is instantly recognisable at Fallibroome Academy in Macclesfield, Cheshire, where he navigates the corridors in his wheelchair, surrounded by friends. Born in Switzerland, his family moved to England when he was six. Since then, he has attended mainstream schools, determined to learn alongside his peers. "The best thing has been that, just like my big brothers, I’ve been able to learn and develop skills and gain knowledge of the world around me," he says via his AAC device. His GCSE results are a testament to his perseverance and the support of assistive technology.
How Eye-Tracking Technology Works
Eye-tracking technology allows individuals with limited mobility to control a computer or communication device using eye movements. For Patrick, this meant spending four months completing his GCSE exams—a process that would take most students a few weeks. The technology has been life-changing, but it is not without limitations. Speed and fatigue are significant factors. Patrick described his GCSEs as "exhausting," underscoring the physical and mental toll of relying on such technology for extended periods.
The Limits of SEND Technology
While eye-tracking has enabled Patrick to access education, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Many SEND students face similar challenges: devices can be slow, cumbersome, and require significant training. Moreover, not all schools have the resources or expertise to implement these technologies effectively. Patrick's success is remarkable, but it also raises questions about equity and support for others who might not have the same opportunities.
Comparison of Assistive Technologies for SEND Students
| Technology | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Eye-tracking | Hands-free, precise control | Slow, tiring, expensive |
| Switch access | Simple, affordable | Limited input speed |
| Speech-to-text | Fast for verbal users | Requires clear speech |
| Head pointers | Direct selection | Neck strain, less precise |
Key Takeaways for Educators and Parents
- Individualised support is crucial: what works for one student may not work for another.
- Training and time are needed for both students and staff to use assistive tech effectively.
- Funding and resources vary widely, creating disparities in access.
- Emotional and physical fatigue must be considered in exam accommodations.
- Inclusion goes beyond technology: social connections and peer support are equally important.
Looking Ahead: Patrick's A-Levels and Beyond
Patrick has now embarked on his A-levels in French, business, and media studies. He remains optimistic but acknowledges the challenges. "The most difficult things have been building meaningful relationships, and communication barriers do exist," he says. His journey underscores the need for continued innovation and investment in SEND technology, as well as a more inclusive society.

FAQ
What is eye-tracking technology and how does it help SEND students?
Eye-tracking technology allows users to control a computer or communication device with their eyes. For SEND students with limited mobility, it provides a way to access education, communicate, and complete tasks independently.
What are the main limitations of SEND technology?
Limitations include slow input speeds, physical and mental fatigue, high costs, and a lack of trained staff to support implementation. Additionally, not all technologies suit every student's needs.
How can schools better support SEND students using assistive technology?
Schools can invest in a range of technologies, provide ongoing training for staff and students, allocate sufficient time for exams and assignments, and foster an inclusive environment that values social connections as well as academic success.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of shorts men, balls seniors, irons seniors, driver beginners, and rangefinder money. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of shoes walking, hybrid clubs, clubs beginners, clubs seniors, and shirts men. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.