Drax Datacentre Emissions: Nearly Double Gatwick Flights Annually 2026

David Hansen
Drax Datacentre Emissions: Nearly Double Gatwick Flights Annually
This page may contain affiliate links.

The Drax datacentre emissions could create nearly twice the yearly emissions of all Gatwick flights, according to a new analysis. The energy company Drax plans to convert part of its biomass power plant in North Yorkshire into a datacentre to meet AI demand, but campaigners warn it could become one of the dirtiest datacentres in the world.

Drax Datacentre Emissions: A Major Environmental Concern

Drax's proposed datacentre would burn 4.9 million tonnes of wood annually, producing emissions nearly double those of all flights out of Gatwick airport each year. This revelation has sparked outrage among environmentalists who argue that the project undermines UK climate goals.


Furniture with Meaning.

Find Original Home Decor sparking conversation at Grand Goldman Shop.


Last year, Drax unveiled plans to repurpose part of its biomass power plant into a datacentre to cater to the surging demand for AI capability. AI datacentres consume massive amounts of electricity to power servers, cooling equipment, and facility systems.

ADVERTISEMENT

Energy Demand and Grid Strain

There are currently 315 datacentres in the queue to connect to the UK's electricity grid, representing 73GW of demand—almost double the peak winter energy demand for the entire UK. Drax's datacentre alone is planned to be 1.2GW, with 100MW from the grid and the rest from its own power station.

Biomass: Clean Energy or Carbon Disaster?

The Drax power station burns millions of tonnes of imported wood to generate energy. This has been touted as a clean way of producing energy that could even result in 'negative emissions' as replacement forests absorb CO2. However, scientists and environmental experts strongly contest this accounting approach. The background to this story is set out in How to Tackle Data Centre Climate Impact and Carbon Emissions. A related thread runs through Thunderstorms Delay Hundreds of Flights at Heathrow and Gatwick. Earlier coverage in The keys to finding the best sunscreen, according to dermatologists, for each skin type - Grand Goldman shows how the argument developed.

Researchers have found that such systems could take 150 years to become carbon negative, meaning they contribute to global heating for decades. Campaigners argue that this makes Drax's datacentre one of the dirtiest out there. A closer look at the same subject appears in Poultry Growth Plan Risks UK National Security, Campaigners Warn. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Carbon Emissions Harm Forests, Not Green Planet, Fossil Study Shows. The same theme surfaces in Energy Utilities: latest articles, which takes a different angle.

Comparison of Emissions: Drax Datacentre vs. Gatwick Flights

Source Annual CO2 Emissions (tonnes)
Drax Datacentre (planned) ~8.8 million
All Gatwick Flights ~4.6 million

As shown, the Drax datacentre could emit nearly twice the CO2 of all Gatwick flights annually. Context on how this played out before sits in New Tool Reveals Fossil Fuel Emissions Damage Estimates. A companion piece, Fossil Fuel Emissions: New Tool Reveals Real Climate Impact, approaches the same subject from another angle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Key Takeaways

  • Drax's datacentre could emit nearly double the CO2 of all Gatwick flights yearly.
  • Burning 4.9 million tonnes of wood annually raises significant environmental concerns.
  • The project adds massive strain to the UK's electricity grid.
  • Biomass energy's carbon neutrality is disputed by scientists.
  • Campaigners label it one of the dirtiest datacentres.

FAQ

What is the Drax datacentre project?

Drax plans to convert part of its biomass power plant in North Yorkshire into a datacentre to meet AI demand, using 1.2GW of power, mostly from its own station.

How do Drax datacentre emissions compare to Gatwick flights?

The datacentre could emit nearly twice the annual CO2 emissions of all flights out of Gatwick airport.

Why is biomass energy controversial?

While biomass is often considered renewable, scientists argue that it can take 150 years to become carbon negative, contributing to global heating in the meantime.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
David Hansen

Author

David Hansen

An engineer, author and high-tech enthusiast whose passion has been evolving for 12 years. After contributing to numerous online publications, David shares his experiences and discoveries on Grand Goldman. He focuses on Smart Homes, Connected Devices, and how they will improve our lives and society in the future.


SPONSORED

Get Lifetime Access to the Lastest Movies, with Exclusive Offers & Free Express Order Delivery.

SPONSORED