New map projections don't make the Mercator wrong, but they do highlight the evolving needs of cartography. The Mercator projection, developed by Gerardus Mercator in 1569, has been a cornerstone of navigation for centuries. Its ability to represent lines of constant course as straight segments made it invaluable for sailors. However, its distortion of landmasses, particularly near the poles, has sparked debates about its inherent bias. Recent discussions, such as those in The Guardian, suggest that transverse Mercator and other projections carry Western bias. But is that fair to the projection itself?
The Mercator Projection: A Tool for Its Time
The Mercator projection was designed for a specific purpose: to aid European sailors in navigating the seas. It preserved angles, allowing for straight-line navigation, which was revolutionary for its time. The fact that it became a standard for world maps is not a result of bias but of its utility. As the article points out, "Mercator et al just did the job of creating maps that were useful for the European sailors they were working for." The continued use of Mercator was more about convenience and familiarity than any deliberate bias.
Understanding Map Projections and Their Purpose
Map projections are mathematical transformations that flatten the Earth's surface onto a plane. Each projection has its own strengths and weaknesses, depending on the purpose. The Mercator excels in navigation but distorts size. The Equal Earth projection, for example, provides a more accurate representation of land areas, making it better for thematic maps. However, no projection is perfect; each serves a different need.
The Myth of a London-Centric Worldview
The claim that a London-centric worldview dominates world maps is misleading. The international coordinate system uses the Prime Meridian through Greenwich, but the center of this system is not London; it's a point in the sea off West Africa. Moreover, modern mapping practices like UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) divide the world into 60 zones, each with its own central meridian. Even the UK's Ordnance Survey maps are not centered on London. Thus, the idea that maps are inherently biased toward London is an oversimplification.
Comparing Map Projections
| Projection | Purpose | Distortion | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercator | Navigation | Area (especially poles) | Marine charts, web maps |
| Equal Earth | Thematic maps | Shape | Global thematic maps |
| UTM | Local mapping | Minimal within zones | Topographic maps |
Key Takeaways
- Mercator was designed for navigation, not as a statement of bias.
- No map projection is perfect; each serves a specific purpose.
- The London-centric worldview is a myth; modern mapping uses multiple centers.
- New projections like Equal Earth offer better representations for modern needs.
FAQ
Is the Mercator projection biased?
The Mercator projection itself is not biased; it was created for navigation and does its job well. The bias comes from how it has been used or misused for purposes it wasn't intended for.
Why do some people say maps are biased?
Maps are representations, not reality. Every projection distorts something, and the choice of projection can reflect certain perspectives. However, the bias is often in the use, not the tool itself.
What is the best map projection?
There is no single best projection; it depends on the purpose. For navigation, Mercator is excellent. For showing accurate areas, Equal Earth or Robinson are better. For local maps, UTM is ideal.
In conclusion, while new map projections offer valuable alternatives, they don't invalidate the Mercator. Each projection has its place, and understanding their purposes helps us appreciate the art and science of cartography.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of travel bag, gift ideas, tee gifts tournaments, overhead launch monitor, and lead acid cart batteries. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of hitting strip simulator, mats simulators, accessories seniors, budget hitting mat, and affordable mat. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.