Israel's president has chosen Gadi Eisenkot, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's strongest rival, to try to form a new government following a deadlocked election that left neither man with a clear path to power. Isaac Herzog's office said he had informed Eisenkot, the leader of the Yashar party, on Saturday night "of his intention to task him with forming a government." The formal appointment will take place in an official ceremony on Sunday at the president's residence in Jerusalem.
Why the President Chose Eisenkot
Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving leader, is fighting to hold on to office after his religious-nationalist coalition lost its majority in an election on 27 October but still emerged as the largest bloc in parliament. An anti-Netanyahu grouping led by Eisenkot, an ex-military chief, has refused to join forces with Arab parties who could hand it a majority. But Arab leaders, angered by policies of Netanyahu and his far-right allies, still nominated Eisenkot during marathon talks with Herzog.
The president's decision reflects the complicated arithmetic of Israeli coalition politics. Although Netanyahu's bloc is the largest, it does not have enough seats to form a majority without support from parties that have ruled out sitting with him. Eisenkot, by contrast, has emerged as the focal point for parties seeking an alternative to Netanyahu's leadership.
What Happens Next in Government Formation
Eisenkot now faces the daunting task of assembling a coalition from a fragmented parliament. He must negotiate with multiple parties, each with its own demands, while navigating the refusal of some partners to work with Arab parties. The process is expected to be complex and could take weeks.
If Eisenkot succeeds, he would become prime minister and end Netanyahu's long tenure. If he fails, the president could task another candidate or send the country to another election. The stakes are high for Israel's political stability and its international standing. The background to this story is set out in Israel Election: Netanyahu Survives as Divisions Deepen. A related thread runs through Israel Election: Hard Lesson for Nationalist Populists. Earlier coverage in Gadi Eisenkot: The Unpolished Anti-Bibi Opposition Candidate shows how the argument developed.
Key Takeaways
- President Herzog has tasked Gadi Eisenkot with forming a government after a deadlocked election.
- Netanyahu's bloc is the largest but lacks a majority, and his far-right allies are a sticking point.
- Arab parties nominated Eisenkot despite refusing to join a government with him, signaling opposition to Netanyahu.
- The coalition negotiations will be complex and could lead to another election if Eisenkot fails.
- Eisenkot's success would mark a significant shift in Israeli politics, ending Netanyahu's long rule.
Comparison of Election Outcomes
| Bloc | Leader | Seats | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Religious-nationalist coalition | Benjamin Netanyahu | Largest bloc | Lost majority |
| Anti-Netanyahu grouping | Gadi Eisenkot | Not specified | Refuses to join with Arab parties |
| Arab parties | Various | Not specified | Nominated Eisenkot, angered by Netanyahu policies |
The Road Ahead for Eisenkot
Eisenkot's task is made harder by the refusal of his anti-Netanyahu grouping to partner with Arab parties, which could provide the necessary votes. He must find a creative coalition arrangement or persuade reluctant partners to join. The coming days will see intense negotiations. A closer look at the same subject appears in Gadi Eisenkot: The Media's Anti-Netanyahu Obsession Explained. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Israel Election Commission Rejects Netanyahu Fraud Claims. The same theme surfaces in The Chosen in the Wild with Bear Grylls Review: A Radical Take on, which takes a different angle.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu is unlikely to go quietly. He remains a formidable political force and could still influence the outcome. The president's choice signals a desire for change, but the final decision rests with the Knesset. Context on how this played out before sits in Israel Support Among Democrats Shows Signs of Fracture.
FAQ
Why did President Herzog choose Eisenkot to form a government?
Herzog chose Eisenkot because he is the strongest rival to Netanyahu and has the support of Arab parties who nominated him during consultations. The president's decision reflects the deadlocked election and the need for a candidate who can potentially assemble a coalition.
What happens if Eisenkot fails to form a government?
If Eisenkot fails, the president could task another candidate, likely Netanyahu, with forming a government. If no one succeeds, the country could face another election, prolonging political uncertainty.
Why are Arab parties supporting Eisenkot despite not joining his government?
Arab leaders are angered by the policies of Netanyahu and his far-right allies, so they nominated Eisenkot as a way to oppose Netanyahu and push for a change in leadership, even if they do not formally join the coalition.
What does this mean for Benjamin Netanyahu's political future?
Netanyahu's future is uncertain. He is fighting to retain office, but the president's decision to task Eisenkot signals a potential end to his tenure. However, Netanyahu remains influential and could still play a role in the negotiations or future elections.
The political drama in Israel is being closely watched internationally, with implications for regional stability and global alliances. As Eisenkot begins coalition talks, the world waits to see if he can break the deadlock. In a related development, Israel's stance on international sporting bodies has also drawn attention, with the country withdrawing support for embattled FIFA president Infantino. The coming weeks will be crucial for Israel's political direction.
For those following the intersection of sports and politics, the story of Israel withdrawing support for embattled FIFA president Infantino offers another angle on how national positions shift. Eisenkot's coalition-building efforts will likely influence how Israel engages with international organizations. The outcome of these negotiations could reshape Israel's domestic and foreign policy landscape.
As the coalition talks unfold, observers are reminded of the broader context of Israeli politics, where personalities and alliances constantly evolve. The decision by President Herzog to task Eisenkot is a pivotal moment that could lead to a new era in Israeli governance. With so much at stake, all eyes are on Jerusalem.