Grenfell cladding firm Arconic paid shareholders more than fire victims, revealing a stark imbalance in corporate accountability. The company behind the flammable cladding on Grenfell Tower distributed $74 million to shareholders for economic losses while victims' estates received only $43 million after a lengthy legal battle.
Arconic's Compensation Breakdown
According to a new report by thinktank Common Wealth and financial investigations group FIND, Arconic's payouts were largely covered by insurers, with all but $2 million coming from insurance. The report highlights how ordinary business practices allowed the company to avoid consequential accountability for its role in the fire.
Get Lifetime Access to Top AI Tools
Find Bleeding Edge Business Software at Scandalous Prices on Appsumo.
| Recipient | Amount Paid | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Shareholders | $74 million | Insurer-covered |
| Victims' estates and survivors | $43 million | Insurer-covered |
Corporate Structures and Legal Loopholes
The report argues that Arconic successfully evaded accountability through a series of ordinary business practices. Grenfell United, representing the bereaved and survivors, stated that corporate structures and legal systems have allowed those responsible to move on while the community continues to live with the consequences.
The Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017 claimed 72 lives, including 18 children. Arconic sold Reynobond PE, the flammable aluminium composite material used to clad the tower. The inquiry found the company "deliberately and dishonestly concealed from the market" the true danger of the product in its Grenfell application.
Key Takeaways from the Investigation
- Arconic paid shareholders $74 million versus $43 million to victims.
- Insurance covered nearly all payouts, minimizing Arconic's financial exposure.
- The report calls for stronger corporate accountability laws in England and Wales.
- Arconic denies wrongdoing, and no criminal charges have been brought yet.
FAQ
What was Arconic's role in the Grenfell Tower fire?
How much did Arconic pay to shareholders compared to victims?
What changes are being called for?
The investigation underscores the need for legal reform to prevent companies from evading responsibility. As Grenfell United noted, "Grenfell was not just a tragedy – it was a preventable disaster." The hope is that these findings drive the legal and political changes necessary to ensure no company can evade responsibility in this way again.