Queensland domestic violence victim Cindy was promised a voice in the government's working group, but later was told she was no longer welcome to call the minister's office—a stark example of how domestic violence victim advocacy can be undermined. This article explores the broken promises, confidentiality agreements, and the broader impact on survivors seeking reform.
The Broken Promise of a Victim's Voice
When Queensland minister Amanda Camm announced her hand-picked domestic violence working group, the statement declared the government would “give victims a voice.” However, about a year later, Camm’s chief of staff emailed Cindy, a member with lived experience, informing her that she was no longer welcome to phone the minister’s offices. If she called again, the office would hang up.
Cindy had been dissatisfied with the process and sought a private meeting with the minister to raise concerns. The promise of a meeting was made in front of the group, but Camm never attended; instead, Cindy met with two ministerial staff. This incident is not isolated—three women involved in the working group told Guardian Australia they felt silenced and described consultations as “token” and “waste-of-time.”
Confidentiality Agreements vs. NDAs: A Fine Line
During estimates hearings, Belinda Drew, head of Camm’s families department, denied that members were made to sign “NDAs.” However, information seen by Guardian Australia confirms members were required to sign “confidentiality agreements” due to sensitive personal information. This distinction is critical, as confidentiality agreements can still prevent public criticism, even if not legally classified as non-disclosure agreements.
The women say they felt unable to publicly raise concerns because of these agreements. This creates a chilling effect, undermining the very purpose of a working group meant to give victims a voice. The government buried the group’s summary report and recommendations after members were heavily critical of police responses and called for significant reforms.
Key Takeaways for Accountability
- Victim advocacy requires genuine listening, not just symbolic inclusion.
- Confidentiality agreements can effectively silence survivors, even without formal NDAs.
- Governments must ensure that working groups have real influence on policy, not just advisory roles.
- Transparency is essential when public promises are made to victims.
Comparison: Promised Voice vs. Actual Experience
| Aspect | Promised | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Access to Minister | Private meeting with Amanda Camm | Met with staff, not minister |
| Communication | Open lines for concerns | Told not to call, hang up if called |
| Report Impact | Recommendations considered | Report buried, no public release |
| Confidentiality | No NDAs required | Confidentiality agreements signed |
Impact on Domestic Violence Reform
The silencing of working group members has broader implications for domestic violence policy reform in Queensland. When survivors are marginalized, critical feedback on police responses and systemic failures is lost. The working group’s recommendations, which included significant reforms, were never publicly released, leaving the community without crucial insights.
This case highlights the need for stronger safeguards to protect victim advocates from retaliation and to ensure their voices are genuinely heard. Without such measures, government initiatives risk being performative rather than transformative.
FAQ
What did the Queensland domestic violence working group do?
Why were confidentiality agreements used?
What can be done to prevent such silencing?
This incident underscores the urgent need for transparent and accountable processes in domestic violence advisory bodies. Survivors who volunteer their time and expertise must be respected, not silenced.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of suspension trainer, weighted vest, gym bag shoe compartment, yoga wheel, and trail running shoes. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of lifting shoes, weightlifting belt, kettlebell set home gym, inversion table, and battle rope home gym. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.