In this Big Little Truths review, we examine whether Liane Moriarty's sequel to her mega-hit Big Little Lies lives up to the hype. The original novel debuted at No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list and became an award-winning TV series starring Reese Witherspoon, Nicole Kidman, and Zoë Kravitz. With such a legacy, expectations for Big Little Truths are sky-high—but does it deliver?
Big Little Truths: A Return to Pirriwee Peninsula
Moriarty opens the sequel with a note to readers, acknowledging the impact of the TV adaptation. She explains that the new novel responds to the series by giving more prominence to characters like Renata (played by Laura Dern) and Mary-Louise (Meryl Streep), while also returning to the original setting: the fictional Pirriwee Peninsula along Sydney's northern beaches. The story immediately immerses us in Australia, with magpies swooping and native flora in full bloom.
Twelve years have passed since the publication of Big Little Lies, and the kindergarteners from the first book are now teenagers. Their mothers are navigating menopause, and the idyllic coastal setting is shattered when a severed human finger is mailed to the local high school. This gruesome event sets the stage for a sequel packed with intrigue, drama, and suspense—or so we hope.
Plot and Pacing: Where Big Little Truths Falters
Despite the promising setup, Big Little Truths struggles to maintain the tension that made its predecessor a page-turner. The narrative meanders, and the central mystery feels less compelling. While Moriarty's sharp observations about suburban life and female friendships remain, the stakes never quite reach the heights of the original.
The characters, once vibrant and unpredictable, now seem to go through the motions. The new additions, including the high school setting and teenage perspectives, add some freshness but are underdeveloped. The book tries to balance too many storylines, resulting in a diluted impact.
Key Takeaways from Big Little Truths
- Disappointing follow-up: Fails to capture the magic of Big Little Lies.
- Character overload: Too many subplots dilute the main mystery.
- Lost tension: The suspense is muted compared to the original.
- Still readable: Moriarty's writing style remains engaging for fans.
Big Little Truths vs. Big Little Lies: A Comparison
To understand where the sequel falls short, let's compare key elements of both books.
| Element | Big Little Lies | Big Little Truths |
|---|---|---|
| Suspense Level | High | Moderate |
| Character Development | Deep and nuanced | Uneven |
| Plot Focus | Tight and gripping | Scattered |
| Ending Impact | Shocking and satisfying | Predictable |
Is Big Little Truths Worth Reading?
For die-hard fans of Liane Moriarty, Big Little Truths offers a chance to revisit beloved characters and the picturesque Pirriwee Peninsula. However, those expecting the same lightning-in-a-bottle suspense as Big Little Lies may be disappointed. The sequel is a decent read but lacks the originality and punch that made the first book a cultural phenomenon.
FAQ
Is Big Little Truths a sequel to Big Little Lies?
Yes, Big Little Truths is Liane Moriarty's first sequel and continues the story of the characters from Big Little Lies, set 12 years later.
Do I need to read Big Little Lies before Big Little Truths?
While not strictly necessary, reading Big Little Lies first will enhance your understanding of the characters and their backstories.
Is Big Little Truths as good as Big Little Lies?
Most critics and readers agree that Big Little Truths falls short of the original in terms of suspense and character development, though it still has its moments.