Disaster insurance, datacenters, and right to repair are emerging as key green policies in the 2026 midterm elections, as candidates navigate the complex landscape of climate-hushing. When Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a law erasing the words “climate change” from state statutes in May 2024 – colloquially known as the “don’t say climate change” law – Democrats were outraged. Just six months later, many liberal politicians began to go quiet on the issue themselves. After Donald Trump won the 2024 election, mentions of the climate crisis started to disappear from Democrats’ rhetoric. As the 2026 midterms approach, that retreat is still shaping how some candidates talk about climate on the campaign trail.
The trend, known as “climate-hushing”, may reflect the limitations of Joe Biden’s climate policies, said Daniel Aldana Cohen, assistant sociology professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who studies climate politics and inequality. Green jobs and housing investments fell short of the climate movement’s desires, consumer incentives disproportionately benefited wealthier households, and Democrats struggled to effectively communicate their accomplishments. The president has since rolled back many Biden-era clean energy incentives and regulations.
The climate crisis, however, is still rearing its head around the country, fueling the heatwaves, wildfires and floods plaguing communities around the US. It also lurks behind issues animating voters, from datacenter expansion to rising home insurance rates. And while some pundits have concluded from this that climate is a losing issue, candidates are finding innovative ways to address it through green policies that resonate with voters’ immediate concerns.
Disaster Insurance: A Gateway to Climate Resilience
As extreme weather events become more frequent and severe, disaster insurance has become a critical issue for homeowners and businesses alike. Rising premiums and insurers withdrawing from high-risk areas have made this a kitchen-table issue that candidates can address without explicitly invoking climate change. By focusing on disaster insurance, politicians can discuss the need for climate resilience and adaptation in a way that appeals to voters’ pocketbooks.
For example, candidates are proposing measures to create state-backed insurance programs, incentivize mitigation efforts, and improve risk mapping. These policies not only address the immediate financial concerns of constituents but also implicitly acknowledge the changing climate. “Disaster insurance is the perfect entry point for discussing climate adaptation,” says Cohen. “It’s tangible, it’s urgent, and it doesn’t require using the loaded term ‘climate change’.”

Datacenters: The Hidden Climate Issue
The explosive growth of datacenters to support AI and cloud computing has significant energy and water demands. In many communities, the construction of these facilities has sparked debates over resource allocation and environmental impact. Candidates are increasingly highlighting the need for sustainable datacenter practices, including renewable energy sourcing, water conservation, and community benefits agreements.
This issue allows politicians to talk about green policies in the context of economic development and technological innovation. By advocating for responsible datacenter growth, they can appeal to both environmentalists and business interests. Moreover, the push for greener datacenters ties into broader discussions about energy infrastructure and grid modernization.
Right to Repair: Reducing E-Waste and Promoting Sustainability
The right to repair movement is gaining traction as a green policy that transcends traditional environmental messaging. By allowing consumers to fix their own devices, we reduce electronic waste, conserve resources, and extend product lifespans. This issue resonates with voters across the political spectrum who are frustrated with planned obsolescence and costly repairs.
Candidates are framing right to repair as a matter of consumer rights and environmental stewardship. It’s a concrete way to promote sustainability without delving into polarizing climate debates. As Cohen notes, “Right to repair is a climate policy in disguise. It’s about waste, resources, and fairness.”
Comparing Green Policy Approaches
To understand how these issues fit into the broader campaign landscape, consider the following comparison:
| Policy Area | Key Focus | Voter Appeal | Climate Connection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disaster Insurance | Financial protection, risk mitigation | Homeowners, businesses in disaster-prone areas | Adaptation to extreme weather |
| Datacenters | Energy and water use, community impact | Local communities, tech industry, environmentalists | Energy efficiency, renewable sourcing |
| Right to Repair | Consumer rights, waste reduction | Consumers, environmental advocates, small businesses | Resource conservation, e-waste reduction |
These approaches allow candidates to address climate-related concerns indirectly, making them more palatable in a political environment where climate-hushing is prevalent.
Key Takeaways
- Disaster insurance is a tangible way to discuss climate adaptation and resilience.
- Datacenters present an opportunity to promote sustainable tech infrastructure.
- Right to repair reduces e-waste and aligns with consumer rights.
- These green policies help candidates connect with voters on immediate issues while addressing climate change indirectly.
- Climate-hushing doesn’t mean climate action is off the table; it’s being reframed.
FAQ
What is climate-hushing?
Climate-hushing refers to the trend of politicians avoiding explicit mentions of climate change in their rhetoric, often due to political backlash or perceived voter priorities. Instead, they focus on related issues like disaster insurance, datacenters, and right to repair.
How do datacenters relate to green policies?
Datacenters consume significant energy and water, contributing to carbon emissions. Green policies aim to make them more sustainable through renewable energy, efficient cooling, and community agreements, which candidates can promote as part of a broader environmental agenda.
Why is right to repair considered a green policy?
Right to repair reduces electronic waste by allowing consumers to fix devices instead of replacing them. This conserves resources and lowers the carbon footprint of manufacturing, making it an environmentally friendly policy that also appeals to consumer rights advocates.
As the 2026 midterms approach, candidates are finding creative ways to campaign on green policies without triggering climate-hushing. By focusing on disaster insurance, datacenters, and right to repair, they can address environmental concerns while connecting with voters on immediate, relatable issues. This strategy may prove crucial in advancing climate action in a politically divided landscape.

Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of wild blueberry powder, wax brazilian, walking shoes after knee replacement, vibrator menopause, and under eye skin booster. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of peptides bodybuilding, toothpaste braces, toothpaste all on implants, toothpaste after scaling, and things put on face after dermaplaning. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.