A Melbourne rape trial has heard that the alleged victim 'could have done a much better job' if she invented the claims against a well-connected man. The accused faces two rape and one sexual assault charge, pleading not guilty in Victoria's county court.
Key Aspects of the Case
Prosecutor Matthew Fisher highlighted six critical points, including the complainant's consistent account to her mother, police, and a doctor within 24 hours. He argued that trauma affects memory but noted her account never wavered.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
The accused's lawyer, Dermot Dann KC, described the prosecution as a 'horrendous mixture of lies, fabrications, and inconsistencies'. The alleged victim gave evidence in a closed court, while the accused did not testify.
Timeline of Alleged Incident
The alleged offences occurred in March 2023 after the woman—a former personal assistant—spent an evening drinking and taking cocaine with the accused, listening to music and watching football. Prosecution claims he tried to kiss her, sexually assaulted her, then raped her twice.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| March 2023 | Alleged assault at accused's home |
| Next 24 hours | Victim reports to mother, police, doctor |
| Trial | Prosecution closes with six key points |
Defense Arguments and Jury Deliberation
The defense claims no offending occurred, pointing to the victim's demeanor and alleged motive to lie. Prosecutor Fisher acknowledged 'complexity' in her personality but insisted that doesn't equate to lying.
Body-worn camera footage captured the victim speaking with police at the accused's house shortly after the alleged incident. That evidence is a cornerstone of the prosecution's case.
Key Takeaways from the Trial
- Prosecution relies on consistent early reports by the victim
- Defense cites contradictions and lack of evidence
- Accused did not testify; victim testified behind closed doors
- Jury will weigh credibility against alleged fabrication
FAQ
What are the charges in the Melbourne rape trial?
The accused faces two counts of rape and one count of sexual assault. He has pleaded not guilty.
Why did the prosecutor say the victim 'could have done better'?
Prosecutor Matthew Fisher argued that if the victim were fabricating the story for money or revenge, she would have created a more polished narrative. The inconsistencies actually support her credibility.
Did the accused testify in court?
No, the accused did not give evidence during the trial. The alleged victim testified before a closed court.
The trial continues as the jury considers the evidence. Stay updated on GrandGoldman.com for more Australian court news and analysis.