SBS Faces Backlash Over Anti-Abortion Advocates on Fertility Show 2026

SBS is under fire for selecting three anti-abortion advocates to discuss falling fertility rates on its upcoming episode of The Feed. The public broadcaster, known for its commitment to diversity and inclusion, has sparked controversy by inviting guests with extreme views on reproductive rights and immigration. The episode, set to air next Wednesday, features George Mamalis, Elspeth McKellar, and Steph Bastiaan, all closely associated with anti-abortion activist Joanna Howe.

Who Are the Guests on The Feed?

The lineup includes George Mamalis, the South Australian head of Turning Point Australia, an offshoot of the late far-right influencer Charlie Kirk's organisation. Mamalis has described feminism as a "death cult" because it gives women reproductive choice. He also claims falling fertility rates lead "to stupid things like mass immigration" and worries about western culture being "replaced." In a recent podcast, he conceded that some migration was needed because "no one's having kids," adding, "Anglo-Saxons, come on, start having kids."

Elspeth McKellar, a content creator from Bird Flip, an organisation that wants to "end abortion," specialises in posting videos of herself confronting people on the street about abortion. Joining them is Steph Bastiaan from Women's Forum Australia (WFA), which describes itself as "pro-woman" and posts predominantly anti-trans content. All three are close associates of Joanna Howe, with Mamalis regularly appearing with her and reposting her content. Most recently, the pair debated whether women should have the vote, with Mamalis speculating that the world would be more "pragmatic" – and would end abortion – if men were the only ones to vote.

The Controversy: Diversity or Dangerous Platform?

The decision to feature these guests has raised questions about SBS's commitment to balanced representation. Critics argue that providing a platform to individuals with such extreme views risks normalising harmful rhetoric. The episode aims to explore falling fertility rates, a complex issue influenced by economic, social, and cultural factors. However, the chosen guests frame the debate around anti-abortion and anti-immigration sentiments, which many see as a distortion of the conversation.

SBS has defended the episode as part of its mission to present challenging conversations. A spokesperson stated, "The Feed is committed to exploring diverse perspectives on important issues." But media analysts point out that diversity should not come at the expense of factual accuracy and respectful discourse. The guests' history of inflammatory statements, including Mamalis's suggestion that women shouldn't vote, raises concerns about the tone and substance of the discussion.

Fertility Rates: A Complex Issue

Falling fertility rates are a global phenomenon, with many developed countries experiencing below-replacement levels. The causes are multifaceted, including increased access to education and contraception, delayed childbearing, and economic pressures. While some attribute the decline to feminism and reproductive choice, experts emphasise that empowering women leads to smaller, healthier families and greater economic participation.

Immigration often complements native-born populations, helping to address labour shortages and support ageing societies. Mamalis's claim that immigration is a "stupid" consequence ignores the economic and social benefits that migrants bring. His call for "Anglo-Saxons" to have more children is a racially charged simplification of a nuanced issue.

Key Takeaways

• SBS's The Feed faces backlash for featuring anti-abortion advocates to discuss fertility rates.
• Guests include George Mamalis, Elspeth McKellar, and Steph Bastiaan, all linked to anti-abortion activist Joanna Howe.
• Critics argue the episode platform normalises extreme views on feminism, abortion, and immigration.
• Fertility decline is a complex issue influenced by education, economics, and reproductive rights.
• Balanced media representation should include diverse voices without amplifying harmful rhetoric.

Comparing Perspectives on Fertility and Immigration

FAQ

The controversy surrounding SBS's episode highlights the challenges media outlets face in balancing diverse perspectives with responsible reporting. While exploring falling fertility rates is crucial, the choice of guests can shape the narrative in harmful ways. As audiences demand more nuanced discussions, broadcasters must ensure that all voices are held to standards of accuracy and respect.