ADHD UK has threatened legal action against an NHS organisation over its decision to impose a minimum two-year wait for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism assessments. The charity alleges that the policy, introduced by West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB), is unlawful and has demanded its reversal, warning of a judicial review if the board fails to act.
Background: The Two-Year Minimum Wait Policy
West Yorkshire ICB introduced the two-year minimum wait earlier this year, affecting thousands of people with possible ADHD or autism across Leeds, Bradford, Kirklees, Calderdale, and Wakefield. The decision was made amid spiralling costs due to the surging volume of assessment requests. However, West Yorkshire is not alone: The Guardian revealed that three other ICBs—Devon, Somerset, and North East and North Cumbria—have imposed similar minimum waits. A further 11 ICBs have introduced other mechanisms to ration assessments.
Legal Grounds for the Challenge
In a legal letter seen by the Guardian, ADHD UK claims West Yorkshire ICB failed to follow correct procedures. The charity alleges the ICB breached equalities legislation, denied patients their legal right to choose non-NHS care, failed to involve patients, carers, or the public in the decision, and acted contrary to NHS contract regulations. Henry Shelford, chief executive of ADHD UK, said the policy was 'unlawful' and that the charity would seek a judicial review if the board does not reverse it.
Key Takeaways
- ADHD UK has threatened legal action against West Yorkshire ICB over a two-year minimum wait for ADHD and autism assessments.
- The charity alleges the policy is unlawful, breaching equalities legislation and patient rights.
- Four ICBs have imposed minimum waits, and 11 others have introduced rationing mechanisms.
- Patients may have the right to choose non-NHS care, but the ICB's policy may restrict this.
- A judicial review could force the ICB to reverse the policy if legal action proceeds.
Impact on Patients and Families
For individuals awaiting assessment, the two-year wait can mean delayed diagnosis, lack of access to support, and worsening mental health. Many families face uncertainty and financial strain if they seek private assessments. The policy has sparked outrage among patient groups, who argue it denies timely care and exacerbates health inequalities.
Comparison of ICB Policies on ADHD and Autism Assessments
| ICB | Policy | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| West Yorkshire | Minimum 2-year wait | Thousands affected; legal challenge |
| Devon | Minimum wait | Rationing due to costs |
| Somerset | Minimum wait | Rationing due to costs |
| North East and North Cumbria | Minimum wait | Rationing due to costs |
| Other 11 ICBs | Various rationing mechanisms | Restricted access |
What This Means for Patients Seeking Assessment
If you are awaiting an ADHD or autism assessment, it's important to understand your rights. Under NHS regulations, patients have the right to choose a provider for their first outpatient appointment, including non-NHS care. However, ICB policies may limit this. Advocacy groups recommend documenting all communication with your GP and the ICB, and seeking support from charities like ADHD UK.
FAQ
What is the two-year wait for ADHD and autism assessments?
The two-year wait is a minimum waiting period imposed by some NHS Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) before patients can receive an ADHD or autism assessment. West Yorkshire ICB introduced this policy in 2024, affecting thousands of patients.
Why is ADHD UK taking legal action?
ADHD UK claims the policy is unlawful because it breaches equalities legislation, denies patients the right to choose non-NHS care, and was implemented without proper patient involvement. The charity is seeking a judicial review to reverse the decision.
Can I still get an ADHD or autism assessment sooner?
You may have the right to choose a non-NHS provider for your assessment, but ICB policies can restrict this. Speak to your GP and consider contacting advocacy groups for guidance. Private assessments are an option but can be costly.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of detergent septic systems, broom concrete finish, water softener well iron, patio furniture arizona, and hammock chair stand. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of oil cedar, small greenhouse heater, sealant water leaks, outdoor glow dark paint, and epoxy foundation crack repair. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.