NHS bodies in England have imposed a two-year minimum wait for ADHD and autism assessments, a move that has sparked outrage among patient groups and charities. The policy, adopted by four integrated care boards (ICBs) covering large regions, is a response to surging demand and financial constraints, but critics warn it could have devastating consequences.
Why NHS Bodies Are Rationing Assessments
The ICBs say they cannot afford the cost of the number of assessments people are seeking. As a result, they have introduced minimum waits of at least two years for suspected attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism. In total, 15 ICBs covering 19 million people have implemented various rationing measures, including limiting the number of assessments paid for each year and using clinical prioritisation to restrict assessment to those with the most serious signs.
The Human Cost of Delays
Patient groups warn that these delays are "scandalous" and may damage children's chances of succeeding at school, deny people the help they need to manage their lives, and increase the risk of suicide. The charity ADHD UK denounced minimum waits as "heartless and dangerous." For many families, a diagnosis is the key to accessing support, accommodations, and understanding.
Impact on Children and Families
Children with undiagnosed ADHD or autism often struggle in school without proper support. They may be labelled as disruptive or lazy, leading to low self-esteem and academic failure. Parents face immense stress trying to navigate a system that seems designed to deny help.
Impact on Adults
Adults seeking diagnosis often face even longer waits. Without a diagnosis, they cannot access workplace adjustments or appropriate mental health support. Many reach crisis point before getting help.
How ICBs Are Rationing Care
ICBs are using a variety of methods to ration assessments:
- Minimum waits: Forcing people to wait at least two years before assessment.
- Caps on assessments: Limiting the number of assessments paid for each year.
- Clinical prioritisation: Restricting assessment to those with the most severe symptoms.
These measures are intended to balance budgets, but they leave many without the support they need.
Comparison of ICB Policies
| ICB Region | Policy | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Region A | Two-year minimum wait | Delays diagnosis for thousands |
| Region B | Annual cap on assessments | Limits access for new patients |
| Region C | Clinical prioritisation | Only severe cases assessed |
| Region D | Combination of measures | Long waits and restricted access |
Government Review and Future Outlook
The disclosure comes before a major government-commissioned review of the rise in mental illness, ADHD, and autism diagnoses. Ordered by Wes Streeting, the then health secretary, the review is expected to address the surge in demand and propose solutions. However, for those currently waiting, the future remains uncertain.
Key Takeaways
- NHS ICBs are imposing two-year minimum waits for ADHD and autism assessments.
- 15 ICBs covering 19 million people have introduced rationing measures.
- Patient groups warn of serious harm, including increased suicide risk.
- Children and adults are both affected by these delays.
- A government review may bring changes, but immediate action is needed.
FAQ
Why are NHS bodies imposing two-year waits for ADHD and autism assessments?
NHS integrated care boards say they cannot afford the cost of the number of assessments people are seeking due to surging demand. They are rationing assessments to balance their budgets.
How many ICBs have introduced rationing measures?
In total, 15 ICBs covering 19 million people have brought in various ways of rationing assessments, including minimum waits, caps on assessments, and clinical prioritisation.
What are the consequences of these delays?
Patient groups warn that delays may damage children's chances at school, deny people help to manage their lives, and increase the risk of suicide. The charity ADHD UK called the waits "heartless and dangerous."
Is there any hope for change?
A major government-commissioned review is expected to be published soon. It may propose solutions to the surge in demand, but immediate action is needed to address the current crisis.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of walking shoes supination, sumo deadlift shoes, work boots plantar fasciitis, cushioned running shoes, and womens running shoes it band syndrome. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of trampoline ski training, leg press hack squat combo, 4d massage chair, stall bars, and speed bag platform home. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.