Critics of the UK government's independent economic forecaster are "shooting the messenger," according to a influential group of MPs. The Treasury committee has rejected calls to fundamentally reform the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), arguing that the fiscal watchdog should not be blamed for tough decisions forced by tight public finances.
MPs Reject Calls to Reform the OBR
The Treasury committee dismissed what it called "siren calls to fundamentally reform" the OBR. In a report, the MPs said the independent forecaster should not be scapegoated when policymakers face difficult choices due to constrained public finances. The committee's findings come amid growing criticism of the OBR from both left and right of the political spectrum.
Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the committee, said critics had sought to portray the OBR as "a wielder of dark powers with a stranglehold on Treasury ministers and officials." But she said the committee's review found "it's simply not true." Hillier added: "The fiscal rules, and therefore the OBR's forecasts, become more important when government spending operates on razor-thin margins. That is a feature of decision-making by chancellors, not overreach by the OBR."
What the OBR Does and Why It Matters
The OBR was established in 2010 by then chancellor George Osborne to provide independent forecasts of economic growth and public finances. Its forecasts are crucial for shaping fiscal policy and ensuring government accountability. The committee's report underscores the OBR's role in maintaining transparency and credibility in UK economic governance.
However, the MPs did suggest some changes. They said ministers should consider instructing the OBR to adopt a 10-year economic forecast to complement its existing five- and 50-year forecasts. Additionally, Parliament should set aside time to debate the OBR's annual fiscal risks and sustainability report, which outlines threats to public finances over the next 50 years.
Key Takeaways from the Treasury Committee Report
- No fundamental reform: The committee rejects calls to overhaul the OBR, calling them "shooting the messenger."
- Support for independence: MPs affirm the OBR's role in providing unbiased economic forecasts.
- Proposed enhancements: A 10-year forecast and parliamentary debates on fiscal risks are recommended.
- Political context: Criticism from both left and right is seen as misdirected.
Comparing the OBR's Forecast Horizons
The OBR currently publishes forecasts over different timeframes, each serving a distinct purpose. The table below outlines these horizons and their significance.
| Forecast Horizon | Purpose | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 5-year | Medium-term economic and fiscal outlook | Twice a year |
| 10-year (proposed) | Longer-term structural trends | To be determined |
| 50-year | Fiscal risks and sustainability | Annual |
Why the OBR Is Under Fire
The OBR has faced criticism from those who argue its forecasts are too pessimistic or that it constrains government policy. Some on the left claim it prioritises austerity, while some on the right say it hinders growth-oriented tax cuts. The Treasury committee's report counters these claims, emphasising that the OBR's independence is vital for credible fiscal policy.
Hillier noted that the OBR's forecasts become more critical when government spending has little margin for error. "That is a feature of decision-making by chancellors, not overreach by the OBR," she said. The committee's stance reinforces the OBR's role as a check on government, ensuring decisions are based on transparent economic analysis.
FAQ
What is the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)?
The OBR is the UK's independent fiscal watchdog, established in 2010 to provide unbiased forecasts of economic growth and public finances. It publishes regular reports that inform government policy and hold ministers accountable.
Why are some critics calling for OBR reform?
Critics from both left and right argue that the OBR's forecasts are either too pessimistic or constrain government policy. Some believe it wields excessive influence over Treasury decisions, but the Treasury committee found these claims to be unfounded.
What changes did the Treasury committee recommend for the OBR?
The committee suggested that ministers consider a 10-year forecast to complement existing five- and 50-year forecasts. It also recommended that Parliament debate the OBR's annual fiscal risks and sustainability report.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of grips, golf simulator under, electric cart hills, turf simulator, and outdoor mats. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of balls, hitting mats, bag mgi zip navigator, bags walking push carts, and hitting strips. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.