A groundbreaking Ulez study shows children's lung health improves in London, providing the strongest evidence yet that clean air zones can reverse the damaging effects of traffic pollution. Researchers from Queen Mary University of London and the University of Oxford tracked thousands of schoolchildren before and after the introduction of the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez) in 2019, finding a significant restoration of lung capacity that had been stunted by exposure to nitrogen dioxide.
How Ulez Transformed Children's Respiratory Health
The study, published in the journal The Lancet Public Health, compared 1,664 children aged six to nine in London with 1,750 children in Luton, a town with similar traffic pollution but no clean air zone. Annual health checks revealed that London children's lung function improved markedly after Ulez came into force, while Luton children showed no such improvement.
Lead researcher Professor Chris Griffiths stated: "Traffic pollution in cities damages children's health and development. We provide the strongest evidence yet on how these harms can be prevented." The findings are a vindication for Mayor Sadiq Khan's controversial policy, which had been criticized as a burden on motorists.
Key Findings on Lung Capacity and Development
Before Ulez, children from the most polluted areas of London had 5-10% less lung capacity than their peers elsewhere. After the zone's introduction, this impairment was largely reversed, with children showing healthier lung growth trajectories. The improvement was most pronounced in areas with the highest initial pollution levels.
Air pollution from traffic has stunted children's lung development for decades, putting them at increased risk of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular and metabolic disease, and premature death in adulthood. This study demonstrates that ambitious clean-air policies can mitigate these risks.
Comparison of Lung Health Outcomes: London vs. Luton
| Metric | London (Ulez) | Luton (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Children studied | 1,664 | 1,750 |
| Lung capacity change | Significant improvement | No significant change |
| Pollution exposure | Reduced nitrogen dioxide | Unchanged |
| Health impact | Restored growth | Continued stunting |
Why This Matters for Cities Worldwide
The Ulez study provides compelling evidence that low-emission zones are not just environmental measures but essential public health interventions. As cities globally grapple with traffic-related air pollution, these findings support the implementation of ambitious clean-air zones as a priority.
Professor Griffiths emphasized: "Ambitious clean-air zones should be considered a priority for cities globally with traffic-related air pollution." The study's robust methodology—using a control city and longitudinal tracking—makes it a landmark in environmental health research.
Key Takeaways for Policymakers and Parents
- Ulez works: Children's lung function improved significantly after the zone's introduction.
- Health benefits are measurable: The study shows a clear reversal of pollution-induced lung stunting.
- Policy implications: Clean air zones should be adopted in cities with high traffic pollution.
- Long-term impact: Improved lung health in childhood reduces adult disease risk.
- Global relevance: Findings apply to any city with similar traffic patterns.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ulez?
What is the Ultra Low Emission Zone?
Ulez is a London policy that charges the most polluting vehicles to enter the city center, encouraging cleaner transport and reducing nitrogen dioxide emissions.
How did the study measure children's lung health?
How was lung capacity measured in the study?
Researchers conducted annual spirometry tests on children aged six to nine, measuring forced expiratory volume and other lung function indicators over several years.
Are there any limitations to the Ulez study?
What are the study's limitations?
The study is observational, so it cannot prove causation, but the use of a control city and adjustment for confounding factors strengthens the findings.
This Ulez study marks a turning point in understanding how clean air policies directly benefit children's health. For parents, it's reassurance that efforts to reduce traffic pollution have tangible, positive outcomes. For cities, it's a call to action to prioritize clean air zones as a public health necessity.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of mothers day deals worth money, digital pressure gauge, l shaped reception desk, fishing table, and hard drive shredder. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of temporary veneers, instant mate, carbon fiber straps basement walls, pickleball paddles tennis players, and sandals wear plantar fasciitis. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.