The recent backtracking on defund the police by AOC and Mamdani has put organizers at risk. As the 12th anniversary of Michael Brown's killing passed, progressive leaders have distanced themselves from earlier abolitionist rhetoric, leaving grassroots activists vulnerable to political backlash.
The Context: Michael Brown and the Defund Movement
On August 9, 2013, Michael Brown Jr. was killed by police in Ferguson, Missouri, sparking a national movement against police violence. During the pandemic, calls to defund the police gained momentum, with many progressive politicians and DSA candidates endorsing the idea. However, as crime rates fluctuate, these same figures are now retreating from their previous positions.
AOC's Shift
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently told ABC News that she has “moved away” from statements made during the pandemic, particularly on police and prison abolition. She referenced a local councilman's saying, “Woke 1 was crazy,” and argued that the discussions were “fruitful” but that rhetoric during lockdown is not what she would use today.
Mamdani's Position
Zohran Mamdani, the progressive New York mayoral candidate, echoed AOC's sentiment, stating that his pandemic-era tweets supporting the defund movement were “out of step” with his current views. He now emphasizes working with the police department to deliver public safety, a stark contrast to his earlier stance.
The Risk to Organizers
This backtracking undermines the credibility of activists who risked their careers and safety to advocate for police reform. Organizers who still believe in abolition are left exposed, facing accusations of extremism from opponents who point to these political reversals as evidence that the movement was never serious.
Moreover, the shift creates a political vacuum. As mainstream progressives abandon the defund message, the narrative is co-opted by centrists who use it to justify increased policing, further marginalizing communities most affected by police violence.
| Politician | Original Stance (2020) | Current Stance (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| AOC | Supported defunding police | Moved away, focuses on crime reduction |
| Mamdani | Tweeted in favor of defund | Opposes defunding, works with police |
Key Takeaways
- Progressive leaders are distancing themselves from defund the police rhetoric.
- This shift risks alienating grassroots organizers who remain committed to abolition.
- Political reversals can be used to delegitimize broader police reform efforts.
- Activists need to adapt strategies to maintain momentum without relying on elected officials.
FAQ
Why did AOC and Mamdani backtrack on defund the police?
What does this mean for police reform activists?
Is defunding the police still a viable policy goal?
As the political landscape shifts, the risk to organizers is real. The backtracking by AOC and Mamdani not only undermines past advocacy but also signals a broader retreat from transformative change. For those on the front lines, the fight continues, but the path forward requires resilience and strategic adaptation.