Arsenal and Chelsea dominate WSL revenue, together outearning the rest of the league combined, according to a review of eight seasons of financial accounts. The so-called 'big four' of Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City, and Manchester United is a myth financially, as the two London clubs have left the pack far behind in wages and turnover.
The Financial Reality of the WSL
Since the division switched to a winter calendar in 2017, cumulative post-tax losses across WSL clubs have exceeded £111 million. This heavy reliance on owner funding underscores the unsustainable nature of current spending levels. However, Manchester United stands out as a rare profitable case, recording a profit of £1.34 million since relaunching their senior women's team in 2018.
Get Lifetime Access to Top AI Tools
Find Bleeding Edge Business Software at Scandalous Prices on Appsumo.
Revenue Disparity: The Big Two vs. The Rest
In 2024-25, Arsenal and Chelsea together generated more revenue than the other ten clubs combined. This financial gap is reflected in their ability to attract top talent and invest in infrastructure. The following table illustrates the financial performance of key clubs over the reviewed period:
| Club | Net Result (since 2017) | Revenue Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Arsenal | Not disclosed | Rapidly rising |
| Chelsea | Loss of £36m+ | Rapidly rising |
| Manchester United | Profit of £1.34m | Stable |
| Brighton & Hove Albion | Eight-figure loss | Rising |
| Leicester City | Eight-figure loss | Rising |
| Manchester City | Eight-figure loss | Rising |
| Tottenham Hotspur | Eight-figure loss | Rising |
Manchester United's Unique Approach
United have bucked the trend by focusing on youth development and maintaining wages below 50% of revenue in the 2022-23 season, when they finished second. Their strategy suggests a sustainable model, but it remains to be seen if it can compete with the financial muscle of the big two.
Key Takeaways from the Financial Review
- Arsenal and Chelsea are the financial powerhouses of the WSL, outearning the rest combined.
- Total WSL losses exceed £111 million since 2017, highlighting reliance on owner subsidies.
- Manchester United is the only club to record a profit, thanks to disciplined spending.
- Rising revenues are matched by rising expenditure, creating a fragile financial ecosystem.
FAQ
Why are Arsenal and Chelsea called the 'big two' financially?
Why are Arsenal and Chelsea called the 'big two' financially?
Because their combined revenue in 2024-25 exceeds that of all other WSL clubs combined, making them the dominant financial forces in the league.
How much have WSL clubs lost in total?
How much have WSL clubs lost in total?
Cumulative post-tax losses exceed £111 million since the 2017-18 season, according to the financial accounts reviewed.
Which club is the most financially sustainable?
Which club is the most financially sustainable?
Manchester United is the standout, having recorded a profit of £1.34 million since 2018, thanks to a focus on youth development and controlled wages.
As the WSL continues to grow, the financial gap between the top clubs and the rest may widen further. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for fans, investors, and stakeholders alike.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of campground state land ny, free ny, free rv parks massachusetts, hammock, and fan. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of mug, tv antennas camper, gear families, toilet, and kettle. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.