Small boat crossings have become a highly visible and contentious issue in the UK, and despite numerous policy attempts, they are likely to continue. The recent scrapping of the 'one in, one out' deal with France highlights the challenges in addressing this complex problem. This article examines why small boat crossings are here to stay and what it means for immigration policy.
The Failure of the 'One In, One Out' Deal
The UK government's 'one in, one out' deal with France, which lasted just 423 days, was intended to deter asylum seekers by returning those who crossed the English Channel in small boats. However, the deal had negligible impact and was quietly scrapped earlier this month. This failure is part of a long list of policies that have tried and failed to address small boat crossings.
In lieu of the deal, the Home Office announced it would double the number of riot police along the French coast. While this may increase security, it does not address the root causes of why people risk their lives to cross the world's busiest shipping channel.
Why Small Boat Crossings Continue
Despite a decrease in small boat arrivals over the last year, the issue remains politically charged. The far right continues to weaponise these crossings, and MI5 has warned that extremists with anti-immigration opinions are increasingly considering terrorist attacks. This underscores the need for a nuanced approach that addresses both security and humanitarian concerns.
Experts like Diane Taylor and Daniel Trilling argue that policies have exacerbated the sense of disorder they're supposed to resolve. Trilling, author of 'If We Tolerate This', suggests that the focus should be on creating safe and legal routes for asylum seekers, rather than deterrence measures that often fail.

Comparing Policy Approaches
Different countries have taken various approaches to manage small boat crossings. The table below compares key policies and their outcomes. The background to this story is set out in UK Small Boat Crossings Drop 43% But Burnham Faces New Surge. A related thread runs through French Riot Police Teargas Asylum Seekers in Deadly Boat Incident. Earlier coverage in Burnham Pledges Relentless Action on Small Boat Crossings shows how the argument developed.
| Policy | Country | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 'One in, one out' deal | UK/France | Failed, negligible impact |
| Riot police deployment | France | Ongoing, increased security |
| Safe and legal routes | Various | Proposed by experts |
Key Takeaways
- The 'one in, one out' deal with France failed to deter small boat crossings.
- Doubling riot police may not address root causes.
- Expert suggest safe and legal routes as a more effective solution.
- Political weaponisation of the issue complicates policy-making.
What Comes Next?
As the government doubles riot police along the French coast, questions remain about the effectiveness of such measures. Experts call for a comprehensive approach that includes safe and legal routes, addressing the humanitarian crisis while maintaining border security. The challenge is to balance deterrence with compassion, and to avoid policies that exacerbate the problem. A closer look at the same subject appears in Burnham Vows Relentless Action on Small Boat Crossings After. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Burnham's Small Boat Crossings Plan: Ceuta Crisis Spurs Action. The same theme surfaces in UK-Funded French Police Teargas Asylum Seekers, which takes a different angle.
Ultimately, small boat crossings are here to stay unless root causes are addressed. The UK must work with international partners to create a fair and effective immigration system that upholds human rights and national security. Context on how this played out before sits in French Riot Police Teargas Asylum Seekers in UK-Funded Operation. A companion piece, Reform UK Navy Plan to Stop Small Boat Crossings: Feasibility, approaches the same subject from another angle.
FAQ
Why did the 'one in, one out' deal fail?
The deal failed due to logistical challenges, lack of cooperation, and its inability to deter asylum seekers from making the dangerous journey. It had negligible impact and was scrapped after 423 days.

Are small boat crossings decreasing?
Yes, small boat arrivals have decreased over the last year, but the issue remains politically charged and far-right groups continue to weaponise it.
What solutions do experts propose?
Experts suggest creating safe and legal routes for asylum seekers, addressing root causes, and working with international partners to develop a fair immigration system.