The UK budget has failed to curb soaring energy bills, according to a leading economic thinktank, which warns that households will still face higher costs this year despite government measures. The Resolution Foundation described Chancellor John Healey's budget as "scattergun" and poorly targeted, leaving Britons facing a painful second half of the parliament.
In his first budget, Healey promised to cushion the blow from rising inflation and "rewire the economy" to boost growth. But the foundation's analysis suggests the measures fall short, with energy bills set to remain higher than during the last energy shock.
What the Budget Actually Delivers for Energy Bills
The budget includes several measures aimed at tackling soaring energy costs. The most prominent are the scrapping of standing charges on gas bills and energy payments of £100 for up to 20 million households in council tax bands A to D.
These measures are intended to provide "breathing space" for the public amid rising prices exacerbated by the Iran war. However, the Resolution Foundation argues that the overall impact is limited and that bills will still be higher this year than during the previous energy crisis.
Healey also pledged to show how the government plans to "rewire the economy" to boost growth, but the foundation's verdict is that the budget does little to boost living standards.
Why the Support Is Poorly Targeted
One of the most damning findings from the Resolution Foundation is that the subsidies to ease the rising cost of living are poorly targeted. According to the foundation, the poorest half of households will gain £158 on average this year and next, just £14 more than the £144 received by the richest half.
Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said this highlights "a complete failure to target help at those who need it most." The near-universal nature of the payments means that wealthy households receive almost as much support as those on lower incomes.
This approach may be politically expedient, but it undermines the effectiveness of the support in addressing the cost of living crisis for those who are most vulnerable.
The Bigger Picture: Living Standards and Growth
The Resolution Foundation's critique goes beyond energy bills. It warns that the budget does little to boost living standards and leaves Britain facing "a painful second half" of the parliament.
With inflation rising and growth sluggish, the government's ability to improve households' financial situations is constrained. The foundation's analysis suggests that the measures announced are not sufficient to turn the tide.
Healey's budget was billed as a way to provide immediate relief while also setting the stage for long-term growth. But critics argue that it lacks the strategic focus needed to address the root causes of the cost of living crisis.
Key Takeaways from the Budget Analysis
- The Resolution Foundation calls the budget "scattergun" and poorly targeted.
- Energy bills will still be higher this year than during the last energy shock.
- Subsidies give the poorest half of households only £14 more than the richest half.
- The budget does little to boost living standards, with a "painful second half" predicted.
- Scrapping standing charges and £100 payments are the main energy measures.
How the UK's Energy Support Compares
| Measure | Details | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Scrapping standing charges on gas bills | Removes fixed daily charges for gas | Small saving for all households |
| Energy payments of £100 | For up to 20 million households in council tax bands A to D | One-off payment, not targeted by income |
| Average gain for poorest half | £158 this year and next | Only £14 more than richest half |
| Average gain for richest half | £144 this year and next | Nearly as much as poorest half |
The table illustrates the limited differentiation in support between income groups, which the Resolution Foundation criticizes as a failure to target help effectively.
What This Means for Households and the Economy
For households, the practical implication is that energy bills will remain a significant financial burden. The £100 payment and the scrapping of standing charges may provide some relief, but they are unlikely to offset the broader rise in costs. The background to this story is set out in Energy Bills Cut £175 for Low-Income Homes: Thinktank Urges. A related thread runs through UK Productivity Growth Outpaces Official Figures, Thinktank Reveals. Earlier coverage in UK Chancellor Targets Cost of Living in First Budget shows how the argument developed.
For the economy, the budget's lack of focus on growth could prolong the period of weak productivity and low wage growth. The Resolution Foundation's warning of a "painful second half" suggests that the government may need to revisit its approach. A closer look at the same subject appears in Chancellor Plans Major Intervention on Rising UK Energy Bills. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Resolution Foundation Criticizes £4.4bn Cost of Living Support Package. The same theme surfaces in Spain's New Energy Package: What It Means for Your Bills, which takes a different angle.
As energy prices continue to be influenced by geopolitical events, such as the Iran war, the government's ability to control domestic bills is limited. But the foundation's critique implies that a more targeted approach could have made a bigger difference to those most in need. Context on how this played out before sits in Energy Support Urged as Bills Rise 4% in Budget. A companion piece, Pip ADHD Autism Benefit Cuts Won't Save Big, Thinktank Warns, approaches the same subject from another angle.
FAQ
What did the Resolution Foundation say about the budget?
The Resolution Foundation described the budget as "scattergun" and poorly targeted, warning that it does little to boost living standards and leaves energy bills higher than during the last energy shock.
How much will households gain from the energy measures?
According to the foundation, the poorest half of households will gain £158 on average this year and next, while the richest half will receive £144 — a difference of just £14.
Why is the support considered poorly targeted?
Because the payments are nearly universal, giving almost as much to wealthy households as to those on lower incomes. This fails to focus help on those who need it most, as criticized by Ruth Curtice.
What energy measures were announced in the budget?
The budget scrapped standing charges on gas bills and introduced energy payments of £100 for up to 20 million households in council tax bands A to D.
The budget's shortcomings have broader implications for UK politics. With the government facing criticism over its handling of the cost of living crisis, the pressure to deliver tangible results will only increase. As the Resolution Foundation's analysis shows, the current approach may not be enough to ease the financial strain on British households.
For those concerned about immigration and deportation policies, the Swedish opposition's stance on helping Britons facing deportation offers a contrasting perspective on international cooperation. Meanwhile, the UK's unpaid carers crisis highlights another pressing social issue, with 1,500 Britons quitting jobs daily to care for loved ones. These challenges underscore the need for comprehensive policy solutions that address the root causes of financial insecurity.
As energy bills continue to dominate household budgets, the government's ability to provide effective support will be crucial. The Resolution Foundation's critique serves as a warning that without better targeting and a clearer growth strategy, the pain for ordinary families is likely to continue.