Mental Health Overdiagnosis Not the Problem for Young People 2026

Mental health overdiagnosis is not the problem facing young people, according to a landmark independent review published last Friday. The review into mental health, ADHD and autism in England found that mental distress across the population, particularly among young people, has substantially worsened. Its chair, Prof Peter Fonagy, told the BBC that former health secretary Wes Streeting had been “completely wrong” to suggest that conditions and disorders were being overdiagnosed. Mr Streeting acknowledged his mistake, but some rightwing politicians and commentators have seized on the notion that medicalisation of ordinary states of mind is behind the huge rise in young people seeking help. This review should bury that idea for good.

Key Findings from the Mental Health Review

The independent review, chaired by Prof Peter Fonagy, delivers a clear verdict: the rises in psychological distress and the need for support with neurodevelopmental differences are real and tied to social changes. It also highlights that current services are not up to what is being asked of them. Fifteen years after the phrase “parity of esteem” gained prominence – the idea that people with mental ill health have equivalent entitlements to those with physical illnesses – it is a long way from being realised. Years-long queues for mental health care and neurodevelopmental support are not even included in official waiting-list figures.

The Reality of Rising Distress

Data from the review shows a sharp increase in young people seeking help for mental health conditions. This is not a case of overdiagnosis but a genuine surge in need. Social changes, including the impact of social media, academic pressure, and economic uncertainty, have contributed to this rise. The review calls for urgent action to address these root causes rather than dismissing the problem as overmedicalisation.

Waiting Times and Service Gaps

One of the most damning findings is the state of waiting lists. Official figures exclude many of those waiting for mental health care and neurodevelopmental assessments, meaning the true scale of the crisis is hidden. Years-long waits are common, leaving young people without the support they desperately need. This gap between demand and provision is a critical failure of the current system.

Comparison of Mental Health Waiting Times

What Needs to Change

The review makes it clear that the focus must shift from debating overdiagnosis to addressing the real crisis. This means investing in mental health services, reducing waiting times, and ensuring parity of esteem between physical and mental health. It also requires tackling the social determinants of mental distress, such as poverty, inequality, and the pressures faced by young people in modern society.

• Mental distress is rising, especially among young people, and is linked to social changes.
• Overdiagnosis is a myth; the review debunks claims that ordinary states are being medicalised.
• Waiting times are hidden; official figures exclude many neurodevelopmental and mental health queues.
• Parity of esteem remains unrealised 15 years after it was introduced.
• Urgent investment is needed to meet the growing demand for support.

FAQ