An Austrian MEP has spoken out after discovering nude deepfakes of herself circulating online, urging the EU to take action against the growing threat of AI-generated sexual abuse targeting women in politics. Lena Schilling of the Green party said she learned last month about the manipulated images, which used footage from one of her first press conferences.
“I felt disgusted,” Schilling said. “I remember how nervous I was and how much I had prepared for the press conference. And then to see someone using this image in a way aimed at harming and humiliating me was really hard to grasp.”
The images had been digitally altered to remove her clothing, turning a defining career moment into a tool for humiliation. Schilling is one of 50 MEPs—46 of them women—identified in a report by Agora Digitale Transformation (ADT) as targets of sexualised deepfakes.
What Happened: Deepfakes Hit the European Parliament
The Berlin-based thinktank ADT alerted Schilling to the presence of the images online. Its report found that one in six female MEPs had been targeted by sexualised AI-generated content. An earlier ADT report revealed that 138 female parliamentarians from 22 EU countries had been affected, with women 33 times more likely than their male colleagues to be depicted in or associated with deepfake pornography.
ADT described the finding as laying bare how deepfake pornography had become a “systemic threat to women in European politics.” The report underscores a broader pattern: as AI tools become more accessible, the creation and spread of non-consensual intimate imagery has surged, disproportionately affecting women in public life.
Why It Matters: A Systemic Threat to Democracy
Schilling’s case is not isolated. The statistics point to a coordinated pattern of abuse aimed at silencing women in politics. Deepfake pornography is not just a personal violation—it is a political weapon designed to intimidate, discredit, and discourage women from participating in public life.
The ADT report highlights that such attacks can have a chilling effect on democratic discourse. When women in politics are targeted with sexualised disinformation, it can deter them from seeking office, speaking out, or engaging with constituents. This undermines the representativeness of democratic institutions.
Moreover, the rapid spread of deepfakes online makes them difficult to contain. Once images are posted, they can be shared across platforms and jurisdictions, leaving victims with limited recourse. The EU’s current legal framework is not fully equipped to address this emerging challenge.
Who Is Affected: Women in Politics Across the EU
The ADT findings reveal that the problem extends far beyond the European Parliament. Female parliamentarians from 22 EU countries have been affected, indicating a continent-wide issue. The scale of the abuse suggests that perpetrators are exploiting gaps in regulation and platform moderation.
Schilling’s experience illustrates the personal toll. The images were created from a press conference she had prepared for meticulously—a moment of professional pride now tainted by violation. Her decision to speak out is a call for accountability and stronger protections.
What Can Be Done: EU Action and Beyond
Schilling has urged the EU to take action, and her call is echoed by experts who argue that existing laws are insufficient. The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) includes provisions on illegal content, but enforcement remains inconsistent. Deepfakes often fall into a gray area, and victims face hurdles in getting them removed.
Potential solutions include:
- Clarifying legal definitions of non-consensual deepfake pornography and classifying it as a form of gender-based violence.
- Strengthening platform liability and requiring rapid takedown of such content.
- Funding awareness campaigns and support services for victims.
- Encouraging cross-border cooperation to prosecute perpetrators.
- Investing in detection technology to identify and flag deepfakes.
Some EU member states have started to address the issue, but a harmonized approach is needed. The European Commission has proposed rules on AI, but critics argue they do not go far enough in protecting individuals from harmful deepfakes. The background to this story is set out in Labour MP Sues xAI: Grok AI Generated Fake Abusive Content. A related thread runs through UK Children Face Surge in Explicit Deepfake Images, Watchdog. Earlier coverage in AI Images Threaten Elections as Deepfakes Spread Rapidly shows how the argument developed.
What to Watch Next
Schilling’s case has put a spotlight on the issue, and pressure is mounting on EU institutions to act. The European Parliament is expected to debate the matter, and advocacy groups are calling for concrete legislative proposals. The ADT report provides compelling evidence that deepfake pornography is not a fringe problem but a systemic threat. A closer look at the same subject appears in Nicola Sturgeon Reveals She Has Not Spoken to Jailed Husband. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Meta Ordered to Remove Deepfakes: AI Video Safeguards Inadequate. The same theme surfaces in UK Children Report Surge in Explicit AI Deepfakes of Themselves, which takes a different angle.
As AI technology evolves, the challenge will only grow. The EU’s response will set a precedent for how democracies protect women in public life from digital abuse. For now, Schilling’s courage in speaking out may help pave the way for change. Context on how this played out before sits in AFL Tells Sportsbet to Stop AI-Generated Player Content. A companion piece, Ai Video: latest articles, approaches the same subject from another angle.