UK Military Spending Must Prioritise Domestic Defence Over Overseas 2026

UK military spending is under scrutiny after a thinktank report warned that the armed forces are too focused on global commitments at the expense of domestic defence. The Transition Security Project analysis reveals that Britain has the most overseas-oriented military among European nations, with almost a quarter of the defence budget spent on commitments across five continents. This imbalance, the report argues, means the government's planned increase in defence spending is likely to result in even greater waste unless there is a fundamental change in stance.

Why Domestic Defence Should Be the Priority

The report describes the current approach as a symptom of a "destructive, outdated foreign policy" centred on overseas missions that have often made the globe less safe. Instead, it calls for a much bigger focus on domestic defence—ensuring the UK's own security and resilience are not compromised by distant engagements. With the government committed to spending 3.5% of GDP on defence by 2035, the thinktank warns that without a shift in priorities, this increase will simply fund more of the same ineffective overseas operations.

The Numbers Behind the Imbalance

Using figures from 2024/25, the study estimated that about 23% of the defence budget is spent on commitments across five continents. This is significantly higher than other European nations, which typically allocate a much smaller share to overseas missions. The planned defence investment plan (Dip) would see the budget double in nominal terms from £70bn in 2026 to £151bn in 2035, according to the Transition Security Project. However, without a change in focus, this extra money could be squandered on missions that do little to protect the UK homeland.

Political Context and Implications

The report emerges amid political turmoil over defence spending. Keir Starmer's government had committed to spending 3.5% of GDP on defence by 2035, but the target for reaching 3% by 2030 has been shelved. John Healey resigned as defence secretary over a refusal to commit to the 2030 target, and now as chancellor, he has delayed that goal. This political uncertainty adds to the urgency of re-evaluating how defence funds are allocated.

Key Takeaways from the Report

• Overseas focus: The UK spends nearly a quarter of its defence budget on missions across five continents—more than any other European nation.
• Waste risk: The planned increase to 3.5% of GDP by 2035 could lead to greater waste if spending priorities don't shift.
• Domestic defence: The report calls for a much bigger emphasis on protecting the UK homeland and its immediate interests.
• Political delay: The 3% by 2030 target has been shelved, creating uncertainty over future funding.

What This Means for the UK's Security

Redirecting spending towards domestic defence could enhance the UK's ability to respond to threats closer to home, such as cyberattacks, terrorism, and regional instability. It could also free up resources for modernising equipment and improving the welfare of armed forces personnel. However, critics argue that reducing overseas commitments could diminish the UK's global influence and leave allies vulnerable. The debate is likely to intensify as the government finalises its defence investment plan.

FAQ