The mother of a robodebt victim has been told she is ineligible for compensation from the historic $475m class action settlement, sparking outrage and claims of further injustice. Kath Madgwick, whose son Jarrad died by suicide in 2019 after being wrongly told he owed nearly $2,000, says she is now experiencing "injustice of another kind" after commonwealth lawyers excluded her from the payout.
Background of the Robodebt Scandal
The robodebt scheme was an unlawful automated debt assessment and recovery program run by Services Australia between 2015 and 2019. It used income averaging to calculate alleged overpayments, often resulting in false debts being issued to welfare recipients. The scheme was widely criticised for its flawed methodology and the severe stress it placed on vulnerable individuals.
Jarrad Madgwick was just 22 when he took his own life after receiving a debt notice. His mother, Kath, has been campaigning for accountability ever since. "I just want them to admit what they've done to my son … to start to take responsibility for their errors, and to ensure that this doesn't happen to somebody else again," she told Guardian Australia.
The $475m Settlement and Exclusion
In 2023, the federal government agreed to pay an additional $475m in compensation to approximately 450,000 robodebt victims. The settlement followed an appeal by Gordon Legal of the original robodebt class action. However, Kath Madgwick was informed last month that she would not be eligible because her son did not receive an official debt notice before or after his death.
Services Australia also disputes that Jarrad's estimated debt was generated through the unlawful income averaging method. This is despite a royal commission detailing the devastating impacts the scheme had on the Madgwick family.
Why Was Kath Madgwick Excluded?
The exclusion hinges on the definition of eligibility for the class action. According to commonwealth lawyers, compensation is only available to those who received a formal debt notice. Since Jarrad did not receive one, his mother is not considered a victim under the settlement terms.
Critics argue that this narrow interpretation ignores the broader harm caused by the scheme, including the fear and anxiety experienced by individuals who were threatened with debt collection. The royal commission found that the robodebt scheme was unlawful and caused significant distress, but it did not specifically address compensation eligibility.
Comparison of Robodebt Compensation Eligibility
| Criteria | Eligible for Compensation | Ineligible (e.g., Kath Madgwick) |
|---|---|---|
| Received official debt notice | Yes | No |
| Debt generated via income averaging | Yes | Disputed by Services Australia |
| Impact acknowledged by royal commission | Yes | Yes |
| Eligible for $475m settlement | Yes | No |
Key Takeaways
- Kath Madgwick's son Jarrad died by suicide after receiving a robodebt notice.
- She has been excluded from the $475m class action settlement because Jarrad did not receive an official debt notice.
- Services Australia disputes that Jarrad's debt was generated through unlawful income averaging.
- The royal commission documented the harm to the Madgwick family, but this did not guarantee compensation.
- Madgwick vows to continue fighting for accountability and to prevent similar tragedies.
FAQ
What is robodebt?
Robodebt was an automated debt assessment and recovery scheme run by Services Australia from 2015 to 2019. It unlawfully calculated welfare overpayments using income averaging, leading to false debts for many recipients.
Why is Kath Madgwick not eligible for compensation?
Commonwealth lawyers say she is ineligible because her son did not receive an official debt notice before or after his death, which is a requirement under the class action settlement terms.
What did the royal commission find about robodebt?
The royal commission found that the robodebt scheme was unlawful and caused significant harm, including mental distress and financial hardship. It detailed the impacts on families like the Madgwicks.
Kath Madgwick's case highlights the ongoing struggle for justice and compensation for all robodebt victims. Her determination to hold the government accountable remains unwavering, as she fights to ensure no other family endures the same tragedy.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of terpenes energy, tea replace alcohol, tattoo removal technology, supplements take tirzepatide, and sun lamp tanning. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of trunk sleepaway camp, wristbands gymnastics, wrist wrap ganglion cyst, on cloud shoe flat feet, and shoes capsulitis second toe. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.