A new analysis reveals that almost a quarter of branded baby foods in UK supermarkets still contain excessive sugar, a year after voluntary guidelines were introduced. The study, conducted by gut health company Alba Health, examined 224 popular infant products and found that 23% breached sugar limits, with some items deriving over 80% of calories from sugar.
The Scale of the Problem
In August 2025, the UK government gave baby food manufacturers 18 months to reduce sugar and salt content, stop marketing snacks to infants under 12 months, and correct misleading labels. However, a year on, 58% of products violated at least one of the nine guidelines, and a quarter breached two or more. This indicates that voluntary measures are not working effectively.
Nora Cavani, CEO of Alba Health, stated: “Parents are not failing their children – they are being misled. Products that contain more sugar than a child should consume in a day are sold under the banner of health and nature.” The findings highlight a systemic issue in the industry.
Which Brands Are the Worst Offenders?
The analysis covered nine leading UK brands: Ella’s Kitchen, Heinz, Organix, HiPP, Kiddylicious, Little Freddie, Piccolo, Aptamil, and Cow & Gate. Among these, Kiddylicious had the highest proportion of high-sugar products, with 52% exceeding limits. Piccolo followed at 28%, Heinz at 27%, and Little Freddie at 24%.
| Brand | % of Products with Too Much Sugar |
|---|---|
| Kiddylicious | 52% |
| Piccolo | 28% |
| Heinz | 27% |
| Little Freddie | 24% |
Some individual products were extreme. Organix raisins contained 66g sugar per 100g (86.6% of calories from sugar), while Kiddylicious apple fruit wriggles had 70g sugar per 100g (85.6% sugars). These are marketed as healthy snacks but are essentially sugar bombs.
Why Voluntary Guidelines Are Failing
The guidelines were designed to be self-regulatory, but the data shows that many brands are ignoring them. The lack of enforcement means companies prioritize taste and shelf appeal over nutritional quality. Additionally, misleading labeling—such as using terms like “no added sugar” when fruit concentrates are used—confuses parents.
Salt levels are also a concern. The NHS recommends babies under one consume less than 1g of salt per day, yet 6% of products breached this limit. Heinz spaghetti bolognese pouches contained 0.27g of salt, over a quarter of an infant’s daily allowance.
What Parents Can Do
While the industry needs reform, parents can take steps to protect their children:
- Read nutrition labels carefully, checking sugar and salt per 100g.
- Choose whole fruits and vegetables over processed pouches and snacks.
- Look for products with no added sugar or salt, but verify the total content.
- Be wary of marketing claims like “organic” or “natural” – they don’t guarantee low sugar.
- Consult a pediatrician or nutritionist for personalized advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the official sugar guidelines for baby food in the UK?
How can I identify high-sugar baby food?
Are there any legal limits on sugar in baby food?
In conclusion, the high sugar content in UK baby foods is a serious public health issue. Parents deserve transparent labeling and healthier options. Until regulations become mandatory, vigilance is key.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of budget motherboard, kvm, pc surge protector, closed back headphones, and pc rust. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of laptop backpack, cat ethernet cable, antivirus, budget projector, and keyboard switch. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.