Andy Burnham is grappling with the defining dilemma of our time: how to tackle the climate crisis while delivering the economic growth voters demand. As he told the Cop summit in Antalya, he wants a new era of British leadership on global heating. But back home, his government has just approved the Jackdaw gasfield, and a decision on the much larger Rosebank oilfield looms. Can he really do both?
The Climate vs. Growth Dilemma
For centre-left politicians, the tension is acute. Voters want action on the cost of living and a growing economy, but they also want a livable planet. Burnham's political strategy relies on shrinking the appeal of the Green party, which helped unseat his predecessor. That means he must be seen to act on climate, but not at the expense of jobs and growth.
The approval of Jackdaw and the looming decision on Rosebank are early tests. Climate activists are dismayed, but ministers argue that domestic gas reduces reliance on imports and supports energy security. Meanwhile, reports suggest the government may weaken targets for electric vehicle sales, further complicating the picture.
Why the Binary Choice Is a False One
The long-term case for green growth is strong: renewable energy, energy efficiency, and clean tech create jobs and reduce costs. But politicians live in the short term, facing binary choices that often pit immediate economic needs against long-term climate goals. Burnham's challenge is to bridge that gap.
He could, for example, pair fossil fuel approvals with accelerated investment in renewables and a clear plan to transition workers. He could also use public control to drive green growth, as he has hinted in his broader economic vision. The key is to make the case that climate action is not a drag on growth but a driver of it.
What Burnham's Approach Means for Business
Businesses need certainty. The approval of Jackdaw and the potential go-ahead for Rosebank send mixed signals: the UK is open for fossil fuel investment, but the long-term direction is toward net zero. Companies in energy, automotive, and manufacturing must navigate this uncertainty.
For Burnham, the risk is that by trying to please everyone, he pleases no one. If he weakens EV targets, he may slow the transition and lose green investment. If he blocks Rosebank, he may face claims of killing jobs. The way forward is a coherent strategy that aligns climate goals with growth.
Lessons from Starmer's Economic Mistakes
Burnham would do well to learn from Keir Starmer's missteps. Starmer's economic plans have been criticized for lacking ambition and clarity. Burnham has a chance to offer a clearer vision: one that uses public control to steer investment toward green industries and ensures that growth is felt in every postcode.
That means not just approving gasfields but also setting out a credible plan for renewables, grid upgrades, and skills. It means making the case that climate action can lower bills and create jobs. And it means being honest about trade-offs.
The Path Forward: Good Growth in Every Postcode
Burnham's economic plan emphasizes good growth in every postcode. That is the right framing: climate action should be part of a broader strategy to spread opportunity. By linking climate policy to local economic benefits—new industries, retrofit jobs, cheaper energy—he can build a coalition that supports both goals.
He should also embrace closer EU ties, which could boost green trade and investment. And he should prioritize public control of key infrastructure to ensure that the transition is fair and benefits communities.
FAQ
What is the Jackdaw gasfield and why is it controversial?
Jackdaw is a North Sea gasfield approved by Burnham's government last month. It is controversial because climate activists argue that new fossil fuel extraction is incompatible with tackling the climate crisis.
What is Rosebank and why does it matter?
Rosebank is a large proposed oilfield northwest of Shetland. A decision on whether to approve it is expected soon, and it is seen as a test of Burnham's climate credentials.
How can Burnham achieve both climate action and growth?
By pairing fossil fuel decisions with accelerated investment in renewables, using public control to drive green growth, and ensuring that the benefits are spread across every postcode.
What does this mean for businesses?
Businesses face uncertainty but should prepare for a long-term shift to net zero. Those in green industries may find new opportunities, while fossil fuel firms must adapt.
Burnham's recent moves, such as his military spending for growth, show he is willing to make controversial calls. But he must also learn from Starmer's economic mistakes and avoid short-term fixes that undermine long-term goals.
His economic plan for good growth in every postcode offers a framework, but it needs to be integrated with climate policy. Public control could be a key lever to ensure that the transition benefits everyone.
As Burnham urges MPs to embrace closer EU ties, he should also push for green trade agreements. And his support for a third runway at Heathrow shows he is not afraid to back big infrastructure projects—but he must ensure they align with climate goals.
Ultimately, Burnham's success will depend on whether he can convince voters that climate action and growth are two sides of the same coin. The seven charts on growth in every postcode illustrate the scale of the challenge, but also the opportunity.