Daniel Andrews Government Conduct Concerning, Ibac Report Finds 2026

The Daniel Andrews government engaged in 'serious and concerning' conduct in dealings with firefighter union boss Peter Marshall, according to a long-awaited Ibac report. The Victorian anti-corruption watchdog found no evidence of blackmail but detailed actions contrary to policy and misuse of information.

Key Findings of the Ibac Report

The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (Ibac) tabled its report in parliament on Wednesday, eight years after the investigation began. The probe focused on negotiations for pay deals with the Country Fire Authority (CFA) and Metropolitan Fire Brigade (MFB), and their later amalgamation into Fire Services Victoria (FSV).

Senior government members were found to have engaged in conduct that included deliberate attempts to conceal and mislead, as well as the misuse of information. Ibac also identified an undisclosed deal with Marshall that allowed him to exert extraordinary influence over negotiations, to the exclusion of other stakeholders.

Privileged Access and Concealment

Marshall was granted privileged access to responsible ministers, according to the report. The investigation began in 2018 after a tip-off that Marshall had blackmailed or otherwise compromised Andrews to change his position on the CFA EBA. However, Ibac found no evidence of blackmail and did not substantiate the allegation.

Comparison of Conduct Findings

Implications for Governance

This report raises significant questions about transparency and accountability in government-union negotiations. The findings suggest that proper procedures were bypassed, undermining public trust in the Andrews government's decision-making processes.

The release of the report follows years of legal attempts by the United Firefighter Union (UFU) to keep it secret, including a high court challenge. This delay itself has drawn criticism from transparency advocates.

Key Takeaways

• Ibac found no corrupt conduct but identified serious breaches of policy and procedure.
• An undisclosed deal gave the UFU secretary extraordinary influence over enterprise bargaining agreements.
• The report highlights the need for stronger oversight in government-union dealings.
• Legal efforts to suppress the report prolonged accountability.

FAQ