Highest and Lowest Google Ratings for Football Stadiums 2026

Daniel Harrolds
Highest and Lowest Google Ratings for Football Stadiums
This page may contain affiliate links.

Which football stadiums have the highest and lowest Google ratings? A comprehensive analysis of Google reviews for every Football League ground reveals that Anfield, home of Liverpool FC, holds the highest rating at 4.7 stars from over 54,000 votes. The lowest rating is 4.0, showing that most fans have positive experiences at stadiums across England.

How Google Ratings for Football Stadiums Are Calculated

Google ratings are based on user reviews, where visitors rate their experience from 1 to 5 stars. For football stadiums, these ratings reflect the overall matchday experience, including atmosphere, facilities, and accessibility. Pete Tomlin, a dedicated fan, manually searched every home ground in the Football League and recorded the rating and number of votes for each. His findings show that the range is narrow, with the highest at 4.7 and the lowest at 4.0. When ratings are tied, the stadium with more votes ranks higher.


Furniture with Meaning.

Find Original Home Decor sparking conversation at Grand Goldman Shop.


Top-Rated Football Stadiums: The Highest Google Ratings

The highest-rated stadiums are predominantly Premier League clubs, reflecting their larger fan bases and modern facilities. Anfield leads with a 4.7 rating from 54,546 votes. Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and Nottingham Forest's City Ground also achieved 4.7 ratings, but with fewer votes (26,545 and 2,245 respectively). Just behind at 4.6 are Old Trafford (Manchester United), Emirates Stadium (Arsenal), and Etihad Stadium (Manchester City).

ADVERTISEMENT
Stadium Club Google Rating Number of Votes
Anfield Liverpool 4.7 54,546
Tottenham Hotspur Stadium Tottenham Hotspur 4.7 26,545
City Ground Nottingham Forest 4.7 2,245
Old Trafford Manchester United 4.6 54,535
Emirates Stadium Arsenal 4.6 34,778
Etihad Stadium Manchester City 4.6 33,000

Lowest-Rated Football Stadiums: The Bottom of the Google Ratings

While the lowest rating is 4.0, several stadiums share this score. These are typically older grounds or those with fewer reviews. The difference between the highest and lowest is only 0.7 stars, indicating that most fans enjoy their visits regardless of the club's success. However, stadiums with lower ratings often have fewer votes, which can skew the average.

Key Takeaways from Google Stadium Ratings

  • The highest Google rating for a football stadium is 4.7, achieved by Anfield, Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, and City Ground.
  • The lowest rating is 4.0, with several stadiums tied at this score.
  • Premier League clubs dominate the top ratings, likely due to larger fan bases and better facilities.
  • When ratings are tied, the number of votes determines the ranking.
  • Overall, fan satisfaction is high, with all stadiums rated 4.0 or above.

Why Do Bigger Clubs Have Higher Google Ratings?

Bigger and more successful clubs tend to have higher ratings because they attract more visitors and often invest in stadium upgrades. Anfield, for example, has undergone significant redevelopment, enhancing the fan experience. Additionally, these clubs have larger online followings, leading to more reviews and higher engagement. However, smaller clubs like Nottingham Forest also boast high ratings, showing that a passionate fan base can elevate a stadium's score.


Article image

FAQ

Which football stadium has the highest Google rating?

Anfield, home of Liverpool FC, has the highest Google rating at 4.7 stars from over 54,000 votes.

What is the lowest Google rating for a football stadium?

The lowest Google rating for a football stadium is 4.0, with several stadiums sharing this score.

ADVERTISEMENT

How are Google ratings for stadiums determined?

Google ratings are based on user reviews, where visitors rate their experience from 1 to 5 stars. The average of these ratings determines the overall score.

Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team at work

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of wild blueberry powder, wax brazilian, walking shoes after knee replacement, vibrator menopause, and under eye skin booster. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of peptides bodybuilding, toothpaste braces, toothpaste all on implants, toothpaste after scaling, and things put on face after dermaplaning. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Daniel Harrolds

Author

Daniel Harrolds

With a career spanning four decades, Daniel is almost a library in the field of precious metals investing and Gold IRAs. His insightful strategies and pragmatic results-oriented approach make him a resource in safeguarding wealth, and financial foresight.


SPONSORED

Get Lifetime Access to the Lastest Movies, with Exclusive Offers & Free Express Order Delivery.

SPONSORED