Paraguay's Eucalyptus Empire: A Community's Fight for Land 2026

In the Indigenous community of Tacuarita, Paraguay, the arrival of the company Paracel six years ago seemed like a blessing. The firm improved dirt roads and dug an electric-powered well, saving villagers a two-mile trek to fetch water from a cattle pond that often made them sick. It also provided forestry jobs to dozens of locals. “They fulfilled all their promises,” says Florencio Garcete, 55, chief of the Mbya Guaraní community of 211 people. But today, the minimum-wage work often dwindles, the well stops during power cuts, and eucalyptus plantations now begin less than 200 metres from the community’s crops and homes.

Paracel, a consortium of the Paraguayan Zapag group, Austrian pulp producer Heinzel, and Swedish forestry company Girindus Investments, is behind what is expected to be the largest private investment in Paraguay’s history. The company plans to invest about $5bn and create 7,000 jobs, mainly in the northern region of Concepción. Financed by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and Paraguay’s government, Paracel says it is protecting existing ecosystems while “reforesting” former ranchland with 162 million eucalyptus trees to fight global heating. It is also building an industrial plant to process these non-native trees, which already cover an area larger than that of some countries.

The Promise and the Reality of Paracel’s Arrival

When Paracel first arrived, the community’s hopes were high. The company’s improvements to infrastructure and job creation were tangible benefits that many had long been denied. However, the initial enthusiasm has faded as the realities of the plantation economy set in. The jobs, while welcome, are often temporary and low-paying, and the well’s reliability depends on a power supply that is inconsistent. More importantly, the proximity of the eucalyptus plantations raises concerns about water use, soil degradation, and the loss of traditional lands.

Why the Eucalyptus Plantations Matter

Eucalyptus trees are known for their high water consumption and ability to alter soil chemistry, which can impact nearby agriculture. For the Mbya Guaraní, who rely on small-scale farming, these changes threaten their food security and way of life. The community says they were not adequately consulted about the plantations and that their concerns have been dismissed. “We said no, no, no, but they kept insisting,” recalls Garcete. The company maintains that it is using degraded land and that the plantations are sustainable, but the community’s experience tells a different story.

The Economic and Environmental Stakes

The Paracel project is a flagship investment for Paraguay, promising thousands of jobs and significant export revenue. The IDB’s involvement signals international confidence in the project’s potential to spur development. Yet, the environmental costs are substantial. Eucalyptus monocultures are often criticized for reducing biodiversity and depleting water resources. While Paracel claims to be “reforesting” former ranchland, critics argue that replacing diverse ecosystems with a single non-native species is not true reforestation but rather the creation of a green desert. The background to this story is set out in Native New Yorkers: Art, Boarding Schools, and the Fight for Land. A related thread runs through Documentary Exposes Fight to Save Indigenous Land from Nuclear Waste. Earlier coverage in Eucalyptus Plantations in Spain: Green Desert for Birds shows how the argument developed.

Who Is Affected and How

The direct impact is felt most acutely by Indigenous communities like Tacuarita, but the ramifications extend beyond. Local farmers may face water shortages and soil degradation. The promised 7,000 jobs are a significant economic boon, but questions remain about their quality and longevity. Moreover, the project’s scale means that land use conflicts are likely to intensify as the plantation expands. The community’s struggle is emblematic of a broader tension between large-scale development and the rights of local and Indigenous peoples. A closer look at the same subject appears in Carbon Fever Threatens Indigenous Rights in Bolivian Amazon. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Kikuyu Land Documentary Exposes Kenya's Stolen Land Fight. The same theme surfaces in Sweden's Sami Mining Dispute: Indigenous Rights vs Rare Earth Minerals, which takes a different angle.

What to Watch Next

As the project moves forward, several key issues will determine its ultimate legacy. The company’s adherence to its environmental and social commitments will be closely scrutinized. The IDB’s role as a financier means it has leverage to enforce safeguards. The Paraguayan government’s willingness to mediate and protect community rights will be tested. And the Mbya Guaraní’s resilience in defending their land will continue to draw attention. The outcome of this David-and-Goliath struggle will resonate far beyond Paraguay’s borders. Context on how this played out before sits in Madrid Tenants Fight Landlords with Art in Housing Crisis.

FAQ

What is the Paracel project in Paraguay?

Paracel is a joint venture between Paraguayan, Austrian, and Swedish companies to establish a massive eucalyptus plantation and pulp processing plant in northern Paraguay. It is expected to be the largest private investment in the country’s history, valued at around $5 billion.

Why are Indigenous communities opposed to the plantations?

The Mbya Guaraní community of Tacuarita says the eucalyptus trees consume large amounts of water, degrade soil, and threaten their traditional farming. They also claim they were not properly consulted and that the company dismissed their objections.

What benefits has Paracel brought to the community?

Paracel improved local roads and built a well, and it provided temporary forestry jobs. However, the community says these benefits have been inconsistent and do not offset the environmental and social costs.

What role does the Inter-American Development Bank play?

The IDB is a key financier of the project, which gives it influence over environmental and social safeguards. The bank’s involvement is seen as a stamp of approval but also as a point of leverage for accountability.

ADVERTISEMENT