The US Army has revived bayonet training, reintroducing a First World War relic into its modern combat curriculum. The decision comes as drones, smart missiles, and electronic warfare dominate the battlefield, yet the Pentagon believes the bayonet still has a role to play.
According to a report by Insider, the Army's Ranger School—one of the toughest training programs in the world—has added new close-quarters assault drills using the bayonet. Soldiers must navigate smoke, tunnels, trenches, and physical obstacles while attacking humanoid targets with knives mounted on the end of their rifles. At first glance, this seems like a military anachronism in the digital age. But for the Pentagon, the move reflects the type of war it expects in the future.
Why the US Army Is Bringing Back the Bayonet
The revival of bayonet training is not about preparing for trench warfare as it was fought in 1914. Instead, it is a response to the changing character of modern conflict. The war in Ukraine has shown that despite advanced technology, combat can still devolve into brutal close-quarters fighting.

In urban environments, soldiers may find themselves in situations where drones and smart missiles are less effective. Buildings, tunnels, and dense terrain can negate the advantages of long-range firepower. In such scenarios, the bayonet becomes a tool of last resort—and a psychological weapon.
Moreover, the Pentagon is concerned about the possibility of a future war where electronic warfare and cyber attacks disrupt communications and GPS. In such a scenario, soldiers may have to rely on basic skills and sheer aggression to prevail. The bayonet symbolizes that primal aspect of warfare.
The Role of the Bayonet in Modern Combat
Critics argue that the bayonet is obsolete in an era of assault rifles and machine guns. However, military historians point out that bayonet charges have occurred even in recent conflicts. During the Iraq War, a group of British soldiers launched a bayonet charge against Iraqi militiamen near Al Amara. The scene seemed straight out of another century, but the British Army considered it a tactical success amid modern combat marked by night vision, digital communications, and advanced weaponry.
That incident, which occurred more than 20 years ago, illustrates that the bayonet can still be effective in certain situations. It is not about the weapon itself, but about the mindset it instills: aggression, courage, and the willingness to close with the enemy.
In the US Army's Ranger School, the bayonet training is part of a broader effort to instill that mindset. Soldiers must navigate a complex obstacle course while engaging targets with their bayonets. The training is designed to simulate the chaos and stress of close-quarters combat.
What the Pentagon Is Preparing For
The Pentagon's decision to reintroduce bayonet training is a signal that it is preparing for a range of contingencies. The wars of the future may not be fought solely with precision-guided munitions and stealth aircraft. They may also involve irregular warfare, urban combat, and prolonged engagements where technology is not decisive. The background to this story is set out in US Tanks vs Ukrainian Drone Army: A Historic Humiliation. A related thread runs through Unitree's Rise in Robotics Has an Unexpected Backer: the US Army. Earlier coverage in Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 Beta Test: Hands-On Review shows how the argument developed.
In this context, the bayonet is a reminder that war is ultimately a human endeavor. It requires soldiers who are physically fit, mentally tough, and capable of adapting to rapidly changing circumstances. The bayonet is a tool that forces soldiers to confront the enemy face-to-face—a scenario that many modern militaries have tried to avoid. A closer look at the same subject appears in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 Review — A Thrilling Blockbuster. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Ford Ranger Military: A Pickup for NATO Allies. The same theme surfaces in US Army Offers GTA VI Leave as Reenlistment Incentive, which takes a different angle.
Furthermore, the revival of bayonet training may be a response to the growing threat of drones. In Ukraine, both sides have used small drones to drop grenades and conduct surveillance. Soldiers have had to develop tactics to counter these threats, including using small arms fire and even bayonets to disable drones. While this is not a primary role for the bayonet, it shows that old tools can find new uses. Context on how this played out before sits in Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Resigns Amid Pentagon Turmoil. A companion piece, Hegseth Fires Army Strategist Over Alleged Classified Leaks, approaches the same subject from another angle.
Key Takeaways
- The US Army's Ranger School has incorporated bayonet training into its combat curriculum.
- The move is driven by the Pentagon's assessment of future warfare, which may include close-quarters combat in urban and disrupted environments.
- Historical examples, such as the British bayonet charge in Iraq, show that the weapon can still be effective in modern conflicts.
- Bayonet training instills aggression and mental toughness, qualities that technology cannot replace.
- The revival of the bayonet reflects a broader shift toward preparing for a range of conflict scenarios, not just high-tech warfare.
Comparing Bayonet Training Then and Now
| Aspect | WWI Era | Modern Era |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Role | Main offensive weapon in trench warfare | Last-resort weapon and psychological tool |
| Training Focus | Massed charges and formations | Individual close-quarters combat and stress inoculation |
| Battlefield Context | Static trenches and no-man's land | Urban terrain, tunnels, and electronic warfare environments |
| Technology | Bolt-action rifles and artillery | Drones, smart missiles, and digital communications |
| Psychological Impact | Esprit de corps and shock tactics | Aggression and adaptability under chaos |
FAQ
Why is the US Army bringing back bayonet training?
The US Army is bringing back bayonet training to prepare soldiers for close-quarters combat scenarios where technology may be less effective. The Pentagon believes future wars could involve urban environments and electronic warfare that disrupt communications, requiring soldiers to rely on basic skills and aggression.
Is the bayonet still used in modern warfare?
Yes, although rarely. There have been instances of bayonet charges in recent conflicts, such as the British charge in Iraq in 2003. The bayonet is not a primary weapon but can be used as a last resort and for psychological effect.
What does bayonet training involve at Ranger School?
At Ranger School, soldiers must navigate smoke, tunnels, trenches, and obstacles while attacking humanoid targets with bayonets attached to their rifles. The training simulates the stress and chaos of close-quarters combat.
How does the bayonet fit into the era of drones and smart missiles?
While drones and smart missiles dominate long-range warfare, the bayonet addresses the human dimension of combat. It instills aggression and mental toughness, and can be relevant in situations where technology fails or is less effective, such as in tunnels or urban strongholds.