Can a Manchester art museum move beyond its troubled past? The Centre for Chinese Contemporary Art (CFCCA) is attempting just that after a series of scandals that rocked the institution and led to its closure in 2020. Now, with public funding restored, the gallery is striving to rebuild trust and relevance in a rapidly changing cultural landscape.
The Troubled History of CFCCA
In March 2020, visual artist JJ Chan was preparing for a group exhibition at CFCCA when they discovered a stark lack of Chinese representation among the staff. Out of 13 employees, 12 were white, while most front-facing volunteers were of Chinese descent. Chan withdrew from the exhibition and published an open letter, stating, “My experience, and my trauma, are being used as a leg-up into an industry for an already overrepresented demographic.”
Later that year, the organisation recruited seven artists of Chinese heritage to address diversity issues, but the initiative was cancelled when those artists raised concerns about institutional racism. The artist-led working group then petitioned for an international boycott, resulting in the resignation of six board members and several employees. After closing due to Covid in 2020, the arts space never reopened.
Rebuilding Trust and Diversity
Two years on, CFCCA has reattained public funding and is under new leadership. The museum has implemented several measures to address its past failures, including a diverse board, a revised mission focused on inclusivity, and partnerships with Chinese diaspora communities. But can these steps truly move the museum beyond its troubled past?
Key Takeaways for Cultural Institutions
- Diversity must be genuine: Tokenistic gestures can backfire and damage credibility.
- Community engagement is crucial: Institutions must listen to and collaborate with underrepresented groups.
- Accountability matters: Acknowledging past mistakes and making structural changes is essential for rebuilding trust.
- Funding comes with responsibility: Public funds require transparency and ethical governance.
Comparing Approaches: Then vs. Now
The table below outlines the key differences between CFCCA’s past practices and its current strategy.
| Aspect | Before 2020 | After 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Staff Diversity | 12 out of 13 white; volunteers mostly Chinese | New diverse hires; board restructured |
| Community Relations | Artists felt tokenised; boycott ensued | Partnerships with diaspora groups; open dialogue |
| Funding Status | Lost public funding; closed | Public funding restored; reopened |
| Exhibition Focus | Curated through white lens; lack of Chinese voices | Emphasis on Chinese diaspora perspectives |
The Road Ahead
While CFCCA has made progress, challenges remain. The art world is watching closely to see if the museum can truly transform. For other cultural institutions, the CFCCA saga serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of authentic diversity and community engagement.
Ultimately, moving beyond a troubled past requires more than new policies—it demands a fundamental shift in organisational culture. Only time will tell if CFCCA can achieve that.
FAQ
What happened at the Centre for Chinese Contemporary Art?
The CFCCA faced allegations of institutional racism after artist JJ Chan withdrew from an exhibition due to lack of Chinese representation among staff. A boycott led to resignations and closure.
Is the museum open again?
Yes, after reattaining public funding, the museum has reopened with a new strategy focused on diversity and community engagement.
What changes have been made?
Changes include a more diverse board, revised mission, and partnerships with Chinese diaspora communities to ensure authentic representation.