Ministers have scrapped plans to cut jury trials in England and Wales, abandoning a controversial proposal that would have replaced juries with a judge sitting alone in many cases. The U-turn follows a fierce backlash from lawyers and others who warned it would undermine a fundamental pillar of the justice system. The decision, announced by the Ministry of Justice, aims to address the record backlog in crown courts, but critics argue it leaves victims and defendants facing years of delays.
Government Drops Judge-Only Trial Plans After Outcry
The proposals, originally drawn up by former justice secretary David Lammy under Keir Starmer's government, sought to tackle the unprecedented backlog by increasing the number of judge-alone trials. The idea was to speed up justice by reducing the time-consuming process of empaneling juries. However, the plans sparked outrage among legal professionals, who argued that jury trials are a cornerstone of democracy and that removing them would erode trust in the justice system. The government has now decided to change course, with justice secretary Alex Norris stating, "I have heard the strength of feeling on the proposals... and have made the decision to change course."
The Court Backlog Crisis in England and Wales
The crown court backlog has reached almost 81,000 cases, and without intervention, it is projected to hit 100,000. This means victims and defendants could wait years for their day in court. The Ministry of Justice claims that scrapping the judge-only trial plans will allow them to start addressing the backlog sooner, as setting up a new judge-only bench division would have taken considerable time. However, the victims' commissioner has expressed concern that abandoning the measures may leave victims waiting even longer for justice.
Comparing the Options: Judge-Only vs. Jury Trials
| Aspect | Judge-Only Trials | Jury Trials |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Faster (no jury selection) | Slower (jury selection and deliberation) |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Public Confidence | Potentially lower | Generally higher |
| Backlog Impact | Could reduce backlog quickly | May prolong backlog |
Key Takeaways from the U-Turn
- Plans scrapped: The government will not proceed with increasing judge-alone trials.
- Backlog persists: Nearly 81,000 cases remain, with projections of 100,000.
- Legal backlash: Lawyers and rights groups opposed the move, citing threats to justice.
- Victims' concerns: The victims' commissioner worries delays will continue.
- New approach: The Ministry of Justice will focus on other measures to reduce delays.
What This Means for Victims and Defendants
For victims and defendants, the U-turn means that jury trials will remain the norm in crown courts. While this preserves a fundamental right, it also means that the backlog is likely to persist unless other effective measures are introduced. The government has promised to bring down the backlog and deliver swifter justice, but the path forward remains unclear. Legal experts suggest that investment in court resources and streamlined processes could help, but only time will tell if these efforts succeed.
FAQ
Why did the government propose cutting jury trials?
The government proposed cutting jury trials to tackle the record backlog in crown courts, aiming to speed up justice by reducing the time and resources required for jury trials.

What was the reaction to the proposal?
The proposal faced a fierce backlash from lawyers and legal professionals, who argued that jury trials are essential to a fair justice system and that removing them would undermine public trust.
What happens now that the plans are scrapped?
Jury trials will continue as before. The government will need to find alternative ways to address the backlog, which remains a significant challenge for the justice system.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of punching bag, smart mirror, portable sauna, percussion massage gun, and gps fitness watch. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of compression boots, cold plunge tub, cycling bike, vibration plate machine, and pilates reformer machine home. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.