Flock Safety Cameras Dropped by Cities But Surveillance Continues 2026

Flock Safety surveillance cameras have become a contentious issue in cities across the US, but even when contracts are dropped, the surveillance continues. The recent decision in Longmont, Colorado, highlights a growing trend: municipalities are canceling Flock contracts, yet new vendors or private systems quickly fill the void. This article explores the implications of ALPR technology, the backlash it faces, and what it means for your privacy.

The Flock Safety Backlash: Why Cities Are Dropping the Cameras

Flock Safety operates over 120,000 cameras nationwide, scanning license plates billions of times monthly. While law enforcement praises these automated license plate readers (ALPRs) for solving crimes, privacy advocates argue they create a warrantless dragnet. In 2023 alone, at least 56 municipalities have deactivated, canceled, or rejected Flock contracts, according to DeFlock, a national advocacy group.

Longmont residents like Andrew Palmer thought they had won a victory when the city council let Flock's contract lapse in December. But months later, a new vendor was approved to install ALPRs, proving that the surveillance infrastructure often outlasts any single company. “They expected us to go away, but there’s a lot of people in our group – including me, to some extent – that would like to see these cameras go away for good,” Palmer said.

How ALPRs Work and Why They're Controversial

ALPRs capture license plate data and timestamps, which are stored and searchable by police. Officers can query this data across state lines to locate stolen vehicles or missing persons. However, the system also records the movements of innocent drivers, and there have been cases of officers misusing the data for stalking. Additionally, concerns persist about data sharing with federal immigration enforcement.

Flock's Response: New Policies, But Are They Enough?

In response to mounting pressure, Flock Safety recently announced updated policies on auditing, data retention, and sharing. These changes aim to address privacy concerns, but critics argue they fall short. For instance, the new retention limit of 30 days still allows extensive tracking, and the auditing process remains opaque. Privacy advocates insist that without a warrant requirement, the system remains a dragnet.

What Happens When Flock Leaves? The Surveillance Void

Even when cities drop Flock, the surveillance often continues through other means. Private companies with cameras on their premises are not subject to the same public scrutiny. In Longmont, the new vendor will install ALPRs, meaning residents are still being watched. This pattern underscores a fundamental issue: the demand for surveillance technology persists, regardless of which company provides it.

• Key Takeaway 1: Flock Safety cameras are being dropped in many cities, but ALPR surveillance often continues via alternative vendors.
• Key Takeaway 2: Privacy advocates argue that warrantless license plate tracking violates civil liberties.
• Key Takeaway 3: Flock's new policies are seen as insufficient by critics, who demand stronger oversight.
• Key Takeaway 4: Citizens can advocate for stricter surveillance ordinances and transparency in their communities.

How to Protect Your Privacy from ALPR Surveillance

If you're concerned about license plate readers, there are steps you can take. Contact your local representatives to voice opposition to ALPR programs. Support organizations like DeFlock that track and challenge surveillance contracts. Additionally, stay informed about data retention policies and request access to your own data where possible.

FAQ

Are Flock Safety cameras legal?

Yes, they are legal in most jurisdictions, but their use is increasingly challenged. Courts have yet to rule definitively on warrantless ALPR data collection, leaving a legal gray area.

How long do Flock cameras store data?

Flock's new policy limits data retention to 30 days, but this is still a significant period for tracking. Some jurisdictions may have longer retention periods.

Can I opt out of being recorded by ALPRs?

No, you cannot opt out if you drive on public roads. However, you can advocate for policies that require warrants or restrict data sharing.

As the debate over surveillance continues, it's clear that dropping one vendor doesn't end the monitoring. Citizens must remain vigilant and push for stronger privacy protections. The fight against mass surveillance is far from over.