Corrections and Clarifications: Guardian Accuracy Updates 2026

The Guardian's corrections and clarifications column ensures journalistic accuracy and transparency. This update addresses recent amendments to articles, including a TV review of Channel 4’s The Great ADHD Myth? and other significant reports.

Corrections to The Great ADHD Myth? Review

Our TV review of Channel 4’s documentary The Great ADHD Myth? contained two inaccuracies. First, it omitted a caption revealing that a 10-year-old boy resumed medication after poor exam results, despite initially stopping for six weeks. Second, remarks by neuroscientist Prof Katya Rubia were misparaphrased regarding ADHD brain differences. We apologize for these errors.

Other Recent Amendments

We have also updated several other articles, including:

• Families release pictures of police officers killed in A66 crash
• Artemis II crew to receive top US space medal
• Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma review
• Apartment rents cost more than half of worker pay in Australian capitals
• Unions fighting for clean energy jobs despite Trump attacks
• London datacentre carbon footprint concerns
• Tyson's beef plant shutdown effects on grocery costs

Our Commitment to Accuracy

We take editorial complaints seriously. Readers can request corrections via guardian.readers@theguardian.com. Our team reviews all feedback to maintain trust and reliability.

Comparison of Correction Types

Key Takeaways

• Corrections are published promptly
• Transparency is paramount
• Readers can submit complaints easily

FAQ