Germany's industrial crisis has reignited a debate over working hours, with business leaders and economists proposing a return to the 40-hour week without additional pay to lower effective labor costs and restore competitiveness. The proposal, reported by the Financial Times, marks a dramatic reversal from the 35-hour week won by metalworkers four decades ago.
Executives from major companies like Mercedes-Benz and Stihl have floated the idea of increasing weekly hours from 35 to 40 while keeping salaries unchanged. The argument is straightforward: a 14% increase in hours worked without a corresponding rise in wage costs would reduce unit labor costs and help German industry regain its edge.
Why Germany Is Rethinking the 35-Hour Week
Germany's manufacturing sector has faced mounting pressure from high energy costs, supply chain disruptions, and intensifying global competition. For years, high productivity offset relatively high wages, but that advantage has eroded. Martin Brudermüller, chairman of Mercedes-Benz's supervisory board, stated that work in Germany has become too expensive compared to other countries and that the productivity edge has disappeared.

The proposal to return to 40 hours is seen as a way to make German labor more cost-effective without cutting nominal wages. By increasing hours, companies can spread fixed salary costs over more output, effectively lowering the cost per unit produced. This approach aims to improve competitiveness without triggering the political fallout of direct wage cuts.

The Economic Logic Behind More Hours, Same Pay
At its core, the proposal targets unit labor costs—the cost of labor per unit of output. If workers produce 14% more hours for the same weekly pay, the effective hourly cost to the employer drops. This can help German manufacturers compete with lower-cost producers in Asia and elsewhere.
However, critics argue that simply increasing hours does not guarantee higher productivity. Factors such as automation, process efficiency, and skill levels also play crucial roles. Moreover, longer hours without extra pay could lead to burnout and reduced morale, potentially offsetting gains.
What This Means for Workers and Employers
For workers, the proposal represents a significant shift in work-life balance and compensation expectations. After decades of fighting for shorter hours, unions are likely to resist any attempt to roll back the 35-hour week. IG Metall, the powerful metalworkers' union, has already signaled opposition to unpaid hour increases.
For employers, the appeal is clear: lower labor costs without the need for layoffs or wage cuts. But implementing such a change would require negotiations with works councils and unions, and could lead to industrial action. The debate is as much about Germany's economic model as it is about working time.
- German industrial leaders propose increasing weekly hours from 35 to 40 without extra pay.
- The move aims to reduce unit labor costs by 14% and restore competitiveness.
- Mercedes-Benz and Stihl executives back the idea, citing high labor costs.
- Unions oppose unpaid hour increases, setting the stage for conflict.
- Productivity gains are not guaranteed and depend on broader efficiency measures.
Comparing Work Hours Across Countries
Germany's 35-hour week in the metal industry is relatively short compared to other developed economies. The table below shows average annual working hours in selected countries, highlighting Germany's position. The longer history behind the story is traced in Germany Debates 40-Hour Week Without Extra Pay to Boost Industry.
| Country | Average Annual Working Hours (per worker) | Weekly Hours (approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1,349 | 35 |
| France | 1,511 | 39 |
| United Kingdom | 1,367 | 36 |
| United States | 1,791 | 46 |
| Japan | 1,607 | 41 |
Note: Figures are approximate and based on OECD data for 2022.
The Broader Implications for Germany's Economy
The debate over working hours is a symptom of deeper structural challenges facing Germany. The country's export-driven model is under strain from geopolitical shifts, energy transition costs, and digitalization. Addressing labor costs alone may not be enough to restore growth. The background to this story is set out in Brazil Cuts Work Week to 40 Hours in Major Labor Reform. A related thread runs through Turning the Tables on Phone Scammers: A 3-Hour Prank. Earlier coverage in Why Germany Has No Rugby Culture: History and Insights shows how the argument developed.
Some economists argue that Germany needs a comprehensive strategy including investment in education, infrastructure, and innovation. Others warn that without significant reforms, the industrial base could continue to shrink, leading to job losses and lower living standards. A closer look at the same subject appears in Rex Patrick Aukus Legal Fees: Labor Under Fire Over FOI Costs. Anyone following the wider picture can start with Water Supply Restored to Gatwick Airport After Hours Without. The same theme surfaces in Gatwick Airport Water Supply Restored After Hours Without Toilets, which takes a different angle.
What to Watch Next
The proposal is still in early stages, but it has already sparked heated discussion. Key developments to monitor include responses from unions and works councils, potential pilot programs at major companies, and political reactions from the German government. The outcome will shape not only Germany's industrial future but also the broader European debate on work-life balance and competitiveness. Context on how this played out before sits in The 24-Hour Day Is a Lie: Why Earth's Rotation Isn't Exactly 24 Hours. A companion piece, Last Night of the Proms Review: A Chaotic Four-Hour Finale, approaches the same subject from another angle.