Harry and Meghan's security funding on their UK return is a private matter, according to Andy Burnham, as the couple plans to relocate to Britain. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will move to a non-royal residence outside London, with their children enrolled in British schools.
Background: The Security Funding Dispute
The question of who pays for Harry and Meghan's security has been a long-running source of tension. After stepping down as working royals in 2020, they lost automatic taxpayer-funded protection. Harry subsequently challenged the Home Office's decision in court, arguing that the UK is his home and he cannot bring his family without adequate safety.
Get Lifetime Access to Top AI Tools
Find Bleeding Edge Business Software at Scandalous Prices on Appsumo.
Andy Burnham's Statement
In a recent statement, Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, emphasized that the security arrangements are a private matter. He said, "This is a private matter. It’s a matter for Harry and Meghan, and we wish them well in the moves that they’re making." This aligns with the UK prime minister's refusal to comment on funding specifics.
Relocation Plans and Family Impact
The couple, who have lived in North America for over six years, will reside in a non-royal property outside London. Their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, are already enrolled in British schools and will start in September. King Charles has reportedly welcomed the decision, hoping to see more of his grandchildren personally.
| Aspect | Before Stepping Down | After Stepping Down |
|---|---|---|
| Security Funding | Taxpayer-funded | Private arrangement |
| Royal Status | Working royals | Non-working royals |
| Residence | Frogmore Cottage | Private residence outside London |
Key Takeaways
- Security funding for Harry and Meghan is considered a private matter by officials.
- The couple will relocate to the UK this month, with children starting school in September.
- No taxpayer-funded armed protection is planned, according to reports.
- Harry's previous legal challenge over security was unsuccessful.