Corrections and clarifications are essential to maintaining journalistic integrity, and this article outlines recent updates to our published content. Our commitment to accuracy ensures readers receive reliable information, and we transparently address any errors that arise.
Why Corrections and Clarifications Matter in Journalism
In the fast-paced world of news, mistakes can happen. However, how we handle them defines our credibility. Corrections and clarifications are not just about fixing errors; they are about upholding trust with our audience. By promptly addressing inaccuracies, we demonstrate accountability and a dedication to factual reporting.
Recent Corrections in Our Coverage
We have recently issued several corrections across different sections. For instance, in our article about aid to Nepal and Tibet, we incorrectly stated that Nepal's Chitwan district borders Tibet. In fact, it borders India. This correction ensures geographic accuracy for our readers.
Another correction involved a review of Robert Harris's novel Agrippa. We mistakenly referred to Octavius as Caesar's nephew, but he was actually his great-nephew. Additionally, we misspelled a Latin inscription at the Pantheon; the correct text is M AGRIPPA L F COS TERTIUM FECIT.
Photo Caption Error in Film Article
In a feature on Éric Rohmer's novel, we used an image from My Night at Maud's but misidentified the person shown. The caption incorrectly named Jean-Louis Trintignant, when it was actually Antoine Vitez with Françoise Fabian. This error appeared only in the print edition.
Other Amended Articles
Beyond these specific corrections, we have updated several other articles to improve accuracy. These include stories about London flats lacking running water, reforestation efforts in Central America, and celebrity tributes to Dolly Parton. Each amendment reflects our ongoing review process.
| Article | Correction Type | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Race to get aid to Nepal and Tibet | Geographic error | Corrected |
| Agrippa by Robert Harris | Historical inaccuracy | Corrected |
| My Night at Maud's image caption | Misidentification | Corrected |
| London flats running water | Updated information | Amended |
How to Report an Error
We value feedback from our readers. If you spot an error, please contact our readers' editor via email at guardian.readers@theguardian.com, or by mail at Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. You can also leave a voicemail at +44 (0) 20 3353 4736.
Key Takeaways for Readers
- We promptly correct factual errors to maintain accuracy.
- Corrections are clearly noted in the relevant articles.
- Reader feedback is crucial for identifying mistakes.
- Our editorial team reviews all reports thoroughly.
FAQ
How often are corrections issued?
Corrections are issued as soon as an error is identified, typically within 24 hours of verification.
Can readers submit correction requests?
Yes, readers can submit correction requests via email, mail, or phone, and our team reviews each submission.
Are corrections visible in online articles?
Yes, online articles are updated with a note indicating the correction, while print editions include a corrections column.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of winter gloves letter carriers, stash bags, snow boots walkers, shoes pacific crest trail, and over helmet ski hood. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of ice climbing rope, low cut shoes, heated boots, cooler sup seat, and backpack philmont. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.