Padel court expansion is rapidly transforming urban landscapes across London, but the conversion of community spaces like Barking Skatepark into pay-to-play venues is igniting fierce opposition from residents and campaigners. The closure of this beloved indoor skatepark highlights a growing tension between the rise of padel—one of the UK's fastest-growing sports—and the preservation of accessible public amenities for local families.
Aiwa Saito, a mother of two, spent over five years bringing her children to Barking Skatepark. For her, the space was more than a recreational facility; it was a safe haven where her 11-year-old daughter Toko, a Skateboard GB talent pathway athlete, could train rigorously. With the skatepark now closed, Saito fears her daughter's Olympic dreams may be dashed: "Without an indoor park, on a wet weekend in winter, where do we go? Where can she train?"
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
The council, which owns the freehold, defended the decision, citing the growing demand for padel courts and the economic benefits they bring. However, critics argue that replacing free or low-cost community spaces with pay-to-play padel courts is a form of gentrification that disproportionately affects deprived areas like Barking and Dagenham.
The Rise of Padel and Its Impact on Community Spaces
Padel, a racket sport played on an enclosed court about a third the size of a tennis court, has exploded in popularity in the UK. According to the Lawn Tennis Association, participation has surged by over 200% in the last three years, with new courts being built in parks, leisure centers, and even former industrial sites. While this growth is celebrated by sports enthusiasts, it often comes at the expense of existing community facilities.
In London alone, multiple proposals have been approved to convert public spaces—including skateparks, basketball courts, and play areas—into padel courts. These conversions are typically driven by private operators who charge hourly fees, making them inaccessible to lower-income families. Eleanor Dunlop, who led the campaign to save Barking Skatepark, stated: "Barking and Dagenham is one of the most deprived parts of the country, and people really need this space to be accessible. I’ve seen panic in people’s faces when I told them that it could close."

Gentrification or Progress? The Debate Intensifies
Proponents of padel courts argue that they bring economic vitality, create jobs, and encourage physical activity among adults. They point to successful models in Spain and Argentina, where padel is a mainstream sport. However, opponents counter that these benefits are often overshadowed by social costs, including the displacement of youth activities and the erosion of free public amenities.
A key concern is the lack of consultation with local communities. In many cases, councils approve leases with private companies without fully assessing the social impact. "Community spaces are being taken away," says Dunlop. "Parents used to come here to socialise while their kids skated. Now they have nowhere to go."
Data: Padel Courts vs. Skateparks in London
To understand the scale of the shift, consider the following comparison based on recent planning applications and facility closures:
| Facility Type | Number in London (2023) | Average Cost to User | Primary Users | Change (2020-2023) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Padel Courts | 120+ | £10-£20 per hour | Adults, middle-class professionals | +300% growth |
| Skateparks (indoor) | 8 | Free or £2-£5 entry | Youth, families, low-income groups | -25% (closures) |
| Basketball Courts (public) | 450+ | Free | Teenagers, local residents | -10% (converted) |
This data reveals a stark disparity: while padel courts are booming, free facilities for young people are shrinking. The trend is particularly concerning in boroughs with high child poverty rates, where families cannot afford pay-to-play fees.
Key Takeaways for Communities and Policymakers
- Community consultation is critical: Councils must engage with residents before approving conversions of public spaces.
- Mixed-use solutions: Design padel courts that coexist with skateparks or other free amenities to serve diverse needs.
- Affordable access: Ensure that any new padel facility includes subsidised hours for local youth and low-income families.
- Protect existing facilities: Prioritise the preservation of free, safe indoor spaces for children and teenagers.
- Monitor social impact: Conduct regular assessments to measure the effects of such developments on community wellbeing.
FAQ
Why are padel courts replacing skateparks in London?
What are the social impacts of converting community spaces to padel courts?
Can padel courts and skateparks coexist in the same area?
As London continues to evolve, the balance between commercial sports development and community needs will be a defining challenge. The closure of Barking Skatepark serves as a cautionary tale, urging policymakers to listen to residents and protect the spaces that nurture future generations.