A coalition of 22 states and the District of Columbia has sued the Trump administration over a new green card benefits policy that could deny green cards to immigrants who use public benefits. The lawsuit, filed on Monday, challenges a rule that expands the "public charge" definition, allowing immigration officers to consider use of Medicaid, food stamps, and housing vouchers when deciding green card applications.
The public charge rule, dating back to the Immigration Act of 1882, was designed to ensure that newcomers can support themselves without relying on government benefits. The Trump administration's new policy is more expansive than a similar attempt during Trump's first term, which was reversed by the Biden administration after legal challenges.
What Is the Public Charge Rule?
The public charge rule allows immigration officials to deny green cards to individuals deemed likely to become a "public charge," meaning they may depend on government assistance. Historically, this was limited to cash assistance for income maintenance or long-term institutional care. The new policy broadens the criteria to include non-cash benefits like Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP), and housing vouchers.
Critics argue that this change will deter immigrants from seeking necessary health care and nutrition assistance, fearing it will jeopardize their immigration status. "Hardworking families should not be forced to go without the support they need because they fear asking for assistance will get them deported," said New York Attorney General Letitia James in a statement. "This rule preys on that fear and counts on families forfeiting the food assistance, health care coverage, and other public benefits to which they are legally entitled."
Comparison of Public Charge Policies
The table below compares the previous public charge policy with the new Trump administration policy:
| Policy Aspect | Previous Policy (Pre-2025) | New Trump Policy (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Benefits Considered | Cash assistance, long-term care | Medicaid, SNAP, housing vouchers, etc. |
| Impact on Families | Limited | Broad, affecting many working families |
| Legal Status | Reversed by Biden administration | Facing lawsuit from 22 states |
Key Takeaways from the Lawsuit
- Coalition of 22 states and DC filed a lawsuit challenging the new public charge rule.
- The policy could deny green cards to immigrants who use Medicaid, food stamps, or housing vouchers.
- Attorney General Letitia James emphasized that the rule preys on fear and discourages families from seeking help.
- This is a broader version of a similar policy from Trump's first term, which was struck down in court.
- The lawsuit argues the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution.
Impact on Immigrant Families
The new policy could have a chilling effect on immigrant families, many of whom are eligible for public benefits but may avoid them out of fear. This could lead to worse health outcomes, food insecurity, and housing instability. States argue that the rule will also impose additional costs on public health and social services.
"This rule is cruel and counterproductive," said California Attorney General Rob Bonta. "It will harm children, seniors, and families, and it will make our communities less healthy and less safe."
FAQ
What is the public charge rule?
The public charge rule is an immigration policy that allows the government to deny green cards to individuals who are likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. The new policy expands the benefits considered, such as Medicaid and food stamps.
Which states are suing the Trump administration?
A coalition of 22 states and the District of Columbia, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, are suing the Trump administration over the new public charge rule.
How does this policy affect green card applicants?
Green card applicants may be denied if they have used or are likely to use public benefits such as Medicaid, food stamps, or housing vouchers. This could deter many eligible immigrants from seeking necessary assistance.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of socks sensory issues adults, small grip pickleball paddles, skin care swimmers, shoes kettlebell training, and shoes blood circulation. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of shock wave therapy machine, sheets psoriasis, running shoes balls feet, sauna heater, and protein powder women pcos. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.