Zendaya is facing intense backlash after wearing a pair of earrings made from ancient Iranian artefacts dating back to 700BC at a London photocall for Christopher Nolan's upcoming film The Odyssey. The earrings, which feature gold and silver components from the Ziwiye hoard, have drawn criticism from archaeologists and art historians who accuse the Hollywood star and her team of cultural insensitivity and the hijacking of Iran’s cultural heritage.
The Controversy Behind Zendaya’s Earrings
The earrings were supplied by Barron London, a Mayfair-based gallery that specializes in historical artefacts. According to a statement from Barron, the pieces were purchased from jeweller Glenn Spiro in 2025 and are attributed to the Ziwiye hoard—a treasure trove discovered in northwestern Iran in 1947. The hoard was looted by shepherds and later sold piecemeal on the international antiquities market. Today, many items remain scattered across private collections and museums worldwide.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Why Archaeologists Are Outraged
Prof. Sussan Babaie, an Iranian-born art historian at the Courtauld Institute, called the use of the artefacts as accessories “shocking” and criticized the lack of cultural knowledge among stylists and celebrities. She stated: “There is not enough cultural knowledge and cultural sensibility among those who dress celebrities, those who accessorise them, those who put them up as symbols of beauty and power.” The row comes amid growing scrutiny of Western institutions that hold ancient artefacts from historically colonized or war-torn regions.
Comparison of Cultural Heritage Protection Views
| Perspective | Key Argument | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Archaeologists & Art Historians | Ancient artefacts should remain in museums or be returned to their country of origin, not used as fashion accessories. | Prof. Babaie’s condemnation of the earrings as a “hijacking” of Iran’s contributions. |
| Jewellery Dealers & Collectors | Private ownership and display of artefacts is legal and can promote cultural appreciation. | Barron London’s statement that they work “privately with collectors, estates and institutions.” |
| Celebrity Styling Teams | Historical pieces can add symbolic or aesthetic value to high-profile events. | Zendaya’s team has not yet commented on the backlash. |
Key Takeaways from the Zendaya Jewellery Controversy
- Ancient artefacts like those from the Ziwiye hoard have complex provenance and are often illegally exported from their origin countries.
- The use of culturally significant items in celebrity events highlights the need for greater cultural sensitivity in fashion and entertainment industries.
- This incident adds to the ongoing debate about the repatriation of cultural property held by Western institutions and private collections.
- Representatives for Zendaya and her stylist have been contacted but have not yet issued a formal response.
FAQ: Zendaya’s Iranian Jewellery Backlash
What exactly did Zendaya wear?
Why are people criticising her?
What is the Ziwiye hoard?
Has Zendaya or her team responded?
This controversy underscores the need for the entertainment industry to engage with cultural heritage experts when selecting props or accessories with historical significance. As the debate over Western possession of ancient artefacts intensifies, incidents like these may prompt stricter regulations and greater public awareness.