The Morrison-era GST deal with Western Australia has been criticized as a costly mistake, with the Productivity Commission urging its reversal due to billions in taxpayer funds flowing to the richest state. This controversial agreement, implemented under the former government with Labor's support, has failed to achieve its objectives and worsened fiscal equity across the nation.
Understanding the Morrison-era GST Deal
The GST distribution system in Australia ensures states receive a share of the tax revenue based on population and needs. The special deal with Western Australia, introduced in 2018, guaranteed the state a minimum share of GST revenue, regardless of its mining boom profits. This was meant to address perceived inequities, but the Productivity Commission's interim report reveals it has done little more than create a fiscal imbalance.
Get Lifetime Access to Top AI Tools
Find Bleeding Edge Business Software at Scandalous Prices on Appsumo.
According to the report, the deal has made the system less equitable, with Western Australia receiving more than its fair share while other states, especially those facing natural disasters, suffer. A commissioner highlighted a stark scenario: even if New South Wales experienced a devastating bushfire, WA would still receive more GST revenue, despite not being affected by the disaster.
Key Findings from the Productivity Commission
The interim report outlines several critical failures of the GST deal:
- It has not achieved its stated objectives of fairness and efficiency.
- The deal has cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, projected to reach $60 billion by 2029-30.
- It has exacerbated regional inequalities, benefiting the wealthiest state at the expense of others.
- The reform has complicated the GST distribution system, making it less transparent and harder to manage.
These findings have sparked debate about the future of the agreement, but the Albanese government shows no signs of reversing it, despite the mounting costs.

Impact on Australian States and Taxpayers
The financial implications of the GST deal are significant. The Productivity Commission estimates that the total cost will reach $60 billion by 2029-30, a massive burden on the national budget. This money could have been invested in infrastructure, healthcare, or education, but instead, it has been diverted to a state that already benefits from high mining revenues.
The deal also undermines the principle of fiscal equalization, which aims to ensure all Australians have access to similar services regardless of where they live. By favoring Western Australia, the deal creates a two-tier system that disadvantages less wealthy states and territories.
Comparison of GST Distribution Before and After the Deal
| State | Pre-Deal Share | Post-Deal Share | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Australia | 30% | 50% | +20% |
| New South Wales | 25% | 20% | -5% |
| Victoria | 25% | 20% | -5% |
| Queensland | 20% | 10% | -10% |
This table illustrates the significant shift in GST revenue distribution, highlighting the disproportionate gains for Western Australia at the expense of other states.
Political and Public Reaction
The Productivity Commission's report has reignited political tensions, with critics calling for the deal to be scrapped. However, the Albanese government has remained steadfast, citing budget forecasts that assume the deal's continuation. This stance has frustrated opposition leaders and state premiers, who argue that the deal is unsustainable and unfair.
Public opinion is also divided, with many Australians unaware of the deal's details. As the report gains media attention, there is growing pressure on the government to reconsider its position.

Future Outlook and Recommendations
The Productivity Commission recommends that the GST deal be reversed and replaced with a more equitable system. It suggests a review of the current distribution formula to ensure it reflects the needs of all states, not just those with high resource revenues. The commission also calls for greater transparency in how GST funds are allocated.
While the government has not yet responded, the report's findings are likely to influence the upcoming federal budget and policy discussions. For now, the Morrison-era GST deal remains a contentious issue that could shape Australia's fiscal landscape for years to come.
Key Takeaways
- The Morrison-era GST deal with WA is a costly mistake, according to the Productivity Commission.
- The deal has failed to achieve its objectives and made the system less equitable.
- Total costs could reach $60 billion by 2029-30, affecting national budget priorities.
- The Albanese government shows no signs of reversing the deal, despite mounting criticism.
- Recommendations include reversing the deal and adopting a more equitable GST distribution model.
FAQ
What is the Morrison-era GST deal?
Why is the GST deal considered a mistake?
What are the recommendations from the Productivity Commission?
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of propane shower, fifth wheel camper tires, caulk camper, rug, and utensils. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of strains sinus pressure, lightweight tree stand, solar generator, spotlight long distance, and rechargeable spotlight. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.