ICE agents deployed to Los Angeles last summer used racial slurs during immigration operations, newly released court documents reveal. The slurs, including “tonks” and “wet,” were exchanged in text chains among agents, signaling a pattern of bias that civil rights advocates say violates the law. This article examines the evidence from the lawsuit and what it means for immigration enforcement practices.
Details of the Court Filings
On July 4, 2025, an unidentified ICE agent wrote in a text chain, “btw tonks everywhere selling food for the 4th festivities in long beach right now,” invoking a known anti-immigrant slur. Two days earlier, another agent used the term “wet,” a derogatory abbreviation for undocumented Mexican migrants crossing the Rio Grande. These messages were made public in a motion filed by lawyers for five men who sued the Trump administration in June 2025, alleging unlawful stop-and-arrest practices during the Los Angeles immigration raids.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Allegations of Racial Profiling
The plaintiffs claim ICE agents targeted individuals based on race and socioeconomic status. In one incident, three men were arrested while waiting at a bus stop for work. A fourth plaintiff, a U.S. citizen, had his arm twisted and was pushed against a gate by masked agents. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Southern California’s deputy director of immigrants’ rights, Maya Joachin, stated the records show “a pattern of racial profiling.” She added that immigration officers are “flagrantly violating the law” by detaining people primarily because of the color of their skin.
Key Evidence and Comparison Table
| Date | Incident | Slur Used |
|---|---|---|
| July 4, 2025 | Agent referenced “tonks” selling food in Long Beach | “tonks” |
| July 2, 2025 | Agent used “wet” about social media posts | “wet” |
| June 2025 | Three plaintiffs arrested at bus stop | N/A |
| Undisclosed | Fourth plaintiff assaulted while proving citizenship | N/A |
The table above summarizes key moments from the court filings. The use of derogatory language highlights systemic issues within ICE and border enforcement agencies.
Broader Context and Implications
The case seeks to bar future detention stops based on race or socioeconomic status. An additional declaration from Angel Santiago Tafolla, a U.S. citizen, describes ICE agents sweeping through a car wash he was at in Anaheim. These events underscore ongoing concerns about racial profiling in immigration enforcement. Legal experts say the lawsuit could set a precedent for how civil rights are protected during federal operations.
Key Takeaways
- ICE agents used racial slurs in internal communications during Los Angeles raids.
- Five men filed a lawsuit alleging unconstitutional stop-and-arrest practices.
- The ACLU calls for an end to race-based detention.
- Court documents reveal a pattern of bias from federal immigration officers.
- The outcome may influence future immigration policy and oversight.
FAQ
What racial slurs did ICE agents use according to the court files?
Agents used the terms “tonks” and “wet,” which are derogatory slurs targeting undocumented immigrants, particularly those of Mexican origin.
Who is behind the lawsuit against ICE?
Five men filed the lawsuit in June 2025, alleging that ICE agents unlawfully stopped and arrested them based on race and economic status. The case is being handled by the ACLU of Southern California.
What does the ACLU say about these incidents?
Maya Joachin, deputy director of immigrants’ rights at the ACLU of Southern California, stated that the records evidence a pattern of racial profiling and that immigration officers are flagrantly violating the law.
How might this case affect future immigration enforcement?
Plaintiffs are asking a federal judge to bar any further stops based on race or socioeconomic status, which could reshape ICE’s operational procedures if granted.