Ultra-processed food companies are hindering global health drives by suing governments that promote healthier diets, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, accused these corporations of obstructing vital public health measures, costing countries billions in healthcare and legal fees. With nearly 1 billion people living with obesity, unhealthy diets fuel heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer, making this a critical global issue.
How Ultra-Processed Food Companies Block Health Policies
The investigation, led by the Guardian and media partners across four continents, found that from 2010 to 2025, 235 lawsuits were filed against health policies targeting ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, the US, and the UK. These lawsuits aim to overturn, weaken, or delay regulations such as front-of-pack warning labels, marketing restrictions, and junk-food taxes.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Publicly, these companies claim to support healthier choices, but behind the scenes, they use legal tactics to protect profits. This pattern of industry interference, as Tedros noted, involves sowing doubt and obstructing action, a familiar strategy seen in tobacco and fossil fuel industries.
Key Tactics Used by Food Corporations
- Litigation against governments to block or delay regulations.
- Lobbying to weaken policy proposals before they become law.
- Marketing to children and vulnerable populations, despite voluntary commitments.
- Funding research that casts doubt on the health risks of UPFs.
Impact of Ultra-Processed Foods on Global Health
Ultra-processed foods now make up half the average diet in many countries, including the UK, US, and Australia. These products are engineered to be hyper-palatable, leading to overconsumption and weight gain. The health consequences are severe, with obesity rates skyrocketing and healthcare systems strained.
Governments are waking up to the economic burden, but their efforts are being undermined. The WHO calls for stronger international cooperation to protect public health policies from corporate interference.

Comparison: Tobacco vs. Ultra-Processed Food Litigation
| Aspect | Tobacco Industry | Ultra-Processed Food Industry |
|---|---|---|
| Legal challenges | Numerous lawsuits against warning labels and advertising bans | 235 lawsuits against health policies (2010-2025) |
| Public stance | Initially denied health risks, then shifted to harm reduction | Claims to support informed choices while litigating |
| Policy targets | Taxes, smoke-free laws, packaging warnings | Front-of-pack labels, marketing restrictions, junk-food taxes |
| Outcome | Gradual adoption of strong tobacco control measures | Mixed success; some policies delayed or weakened |
What Can Be Done to Counter Corporate Interference?
Public health experts recommend several strategies to resist industry pressure. These include international treaties similar to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, stronger legal defenses for governments, and increased transparency in lobbying and litigation funding.
Additionally, empowering consumers through education and clear labeling can shift demand toward healthier options. The WHO urges countries to stand firm against legal threats and prioritize public health over corporate profits.
Key Takeaways for Policymakers and Consumers
- Ultra-processed food companies are using litigation to delay health policies.
- Governments need legal and financial support to defend against these lawsuits.
- Consumers can reduce UPF intake by reading labels and choosing whole foods.
- International cooperation is essential to hold corporations accountable.