Offenbach's Barkouf, a long-lost operetta, has been resurrected by Opera Rara, offering a quirky shaggy dog story that blends political satire with musical wit. Originally premiered in 1860, the work sank without a trace after a critical mauling, but now audiences can judge for themselves whether this tale of a dog appointed Sultan of Lahore deserves a second chance.
The Curious Case of Barkouf: A Lost Operetta Revived
In Barkouf, a dog is appointed Sultan of Lahore, and through the efforts of a resourceful market trader, ushers in a more enlightened despotism. What's not to like? Plenty, according to critics in 1860, including Berlioz, who accused Offenbach of crimes against harmonic convention. The operetta quickly disappeared, with only unpublished fragments resurfacing in recent decades. Opera Rara has now spliced it back together, filling in gaps to present a complete version.
Barkouf followed hot on the heels of Offenbach's masterpiece, Orpheus in the Underworld, and inevitably suffers by comparison. Eugène Scribe's libretto lacks the divine silliness of Offenbach's finest collaborators, blunting the story's satirical potential. Yet Offenbach's energetic score brims with ideas, featuring original orchestrations (including four horns) and a string of witty ditties that pop like uncorked bottles.
Musical Highlights and Low Points
The score of Barkouf is a mixed bag. At its best, it sparkles with Offenbach's trademark wit and melodic charm. At other times, it runs on a lower level of inspiration, suggesting the composer was experimenting but not always succeeding. The orchestration remains a standout, with unusual touches that hint at Offenbach's desire to break new ground.
Opera Rara, the Hallé, and the English National Opera Chorus, under the idiomatic baton of Paul Daniel, gave the work their best shot. The music sparkled, and a fine cast of French speakers clearly enjoyed bringing this curiosity to life. Their enthusiasm is infectious, even when the material falters.
Critical Reception Then and Now
In 1860, Barkouf was savaged by critics. Berlioz's accusation of harmonic crimes seems rich coming from him, but it contributed to the work's swift demise. Modern reviewers, while acknowledging its flaws, are more appreciative of its quirks. The revival allows listeners to assess whether the operetta's satirical bite and musical inventiveness outweigh its shortcomings.
| Aspect | 1860 Reception | Modern Revival |
|---|---|---|
| Critical Acclaim | Negative (mauled by critics) | Mixed to positive (appreciation for quirks) |
| Musical Innovation | Considered unconventional | Praised for originality |
| Libretto | Weak, lacking silliness | Seen as satirically blunt but interesting |
| Overall Verdict | Failure | Worthwhile curiosity |
Key Takeaways from Barkouf
- Historical significance: Barkouf offers a glimpse into Offenbach's post-Orpheus experimentation.
- Musical charm: The score has moments of brilliance, though it's uneven.
- Satirical potential: The libretto fails to fully exploit its premise, but the story remains engaging.
- Performance quality: Opera Rara's revival is committed and well-executed.
FAQ
What is Barkouf about?
Barkouf is an operetta by Jacques Offenbach in which a dog is appointed Sultan of Lahore. A resourceful market trader helps the dog usher in a more enlightened despotism, leading to a quirky and satirical story.
Why was Barkouf a failure in 1860?
Barkouf was criticized for its libretto by Eugène Scribe, which lacked the wit of Offenbach's previous collaborators, and for its unconventional harmonies. Critics like Berlioz condemned it, and it quickly disappeared from the stage.
Is Barkouf worth listening to today?
Yes, for those interested in Offenbach's lesser-known works. The revival by Opera Rara reveals a score with moments of brilliance and historical significance, even if it doesn't reach the heights of Orpheus in the Underworld.
Ultimately, Barkouf is a fascinating footnote in Offenbach's career. Opera Rara's reconstruction allows modern audiences to experience this quirky shaggy dog story and decide for themselves whether it deserves its place in the repertoire. While not a masterpiece, it's a delightful curiosity that sheds light on the composer's restless creativity.