Carrick Fumes Over VAR Call on Haaland's Derby Winner 2026

Michael Carrick has expressed his fury over the VAR decision that allowed Erling Haaland's winning goal for Manchester City against Manchester United in the derby. The United manager was left baffled by the explanation he received regarding Enzo Fernández's interference in the build-up to the 60th-minute strike at Old Trafford on Sunday.

The Controversial Goal That Sparked Outrage

Haaland's goal came after Josko Gvardiol's cross deflected off Patrick Dorgu's boot and made its way towards the United goal. The ball passed Fernández, who was in an offside position, and Lisandro Martínez before Haaland finished it off. Initially, the goal was ruled out for offside, but the video assistant referee (VAR) overturned the decision, determining that Fernández was not interfering with play despite Martínez marking him.

Carrick was incensed by this interpretation. "At the time I hadn't totally seen it. But the explanation I got was he wasn't interfering with play, so I just don't get it," he said. "I can't understand how they're trying to help referees and putting so many layers behind them with so many people, screens, and so many whatever offices to try and come up with the right decisions."

Carrick's Frustration with VAR

Carrick further questioned the logic behind the decision, stating, "If that's how the rules are interpreted, that you're not interfering with play because you've thrown yourself at the ball six yards from goal and pretty much nearly touched it, which then Lisandro has to react from – it's worrying if that's really how the game's seen by those who are officiating it."

The United boss also suggested that an apology from Pro Ref, the official body, would be welcomed. "Yeah, that'd be great, that," he added, highlighting his dissatisfaction with the officiating.

Understanding the Offside Rule and VAR

The offside rule in football states that a player is offside if they are nearer to the opponent's goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent when the ball is played to them, unless they are in their own half or level with the second-last opponent. However, being in an offside position is not an offence unless the player becomes involved in active play.

Interfering with play can include playing or touching the ball, interfering with an opponent, or gaining an advantage by being in that position. The VAR's decision hinged on whether Fernández was interfering with play or with an opponent. The officials deemed that he was not, despite his proximity to the ball and Martínez's reaction.

VAR Decision Breakdown

Key Takeaways from the Incident

• VAR's interpretation of interference continues to spark debate.
• Carrick believes the decision was incorrect and confusing.
• The goal proved decisive in the Manchester derby.
• Calls for transparency and accountability from officiating bodies grow louder.

FAQ

The incident has reignited debates about the consistency and clarity of VAR decisions in the Premier League. As Carrick's frustration shows, even with multiple layers of technology and officials, controversies remain.

Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of suspension trainer, weighted vest, gym bag shoe compartment, yoga wheel, and trail running shoes. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of lifting shoes, weightlifting belt, kettlebell set home gym, inversion table, and battle rope home gym. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.